Find Out How Quickly You Are Able To Climb The Gefitinib Hierarchy

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 11:45, 23 грудня 2016, створена Curve2pocket (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: The anterior axial curvature map, which describes the overall corneal power, showed central steepening in both control and ?5 D LASIK eyes preoperatively, and a...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

The anterior axial curvature map, which describes the overall corneal power, showed central steepening in both control and ?5 D LASIK eyes preoperatively, and at 1, 2, and 3 months post operatively (Figs. 3A�CH). The mean amplitude of astigmatism was RHOBTB1 significantly greater in the ?5 D LASIK group compared with the control group at 2 and 3 months post-operatively (1.82 �� 0.39 vs. 0.83 �� 0.23 D, and 2.93 �� 0.47 vs. 0.95 �� 0.26 D; P = 0.036 and P = 0.027, respectively). A significant increase in the mean amplitude of astigmatism with time was also observed in the ?5 D LASIK group (P for trend = 0.046; Fig. 3I). Figure 3 Representative anterior axial curvature maps of ATLAS corneal topographer images for the control (A�CD) and ?5 D LASIK groups (E�CH) preoperatively (A, E) and at 1 (B, F), 2 (C, G) and 3 months post operatively (D, H). The line graph ... The anterior mean curvature map, which removes regular astigmatism from the anterior axial curvature and reveals the local average curvature, showed progressive inferior steepening in ?5 D LASIK eyes, whereas a more regular topographic pattern was observed in the control eyes (Fig. 4). Figure 4 Representative anterior mean curvature maps of ATLAS corneal topographer images for the control (A�CD) and ?5 D LASIK groups (E�CH) preoperatively (A, E) and at 1 (B, F), HDAC inhibitor 2 (C, G) and 3 months post operatively (D, H). Progressive ... The posterior elevation map, which reveals the irregularity of the posterior corneal surface, showed obvious progressive posterior central-nasal and central-temporal steepening in the ?5 D LASIK eyes, with butterfly-shape ectatic change formation at 3 months. On the contrary, the posterior elevation map in the control eyes showed a normal and regular pattern (Figs. 5A�CH). The mean posterior elevation was significantly higher in the ?5 D Gefitinib in vitro LASIK group compared with the control group at 1, 2, and 3 months post operatively (42.57 �� 7.47 vs. 6.35 �� 1.02 ��m, 55.08 �� 8.56 vs. 5.45 �� 0.81 ��m, and 96.26 �� 13.22 vs. 5.88 �� 0.92 ��m, respectively; all P