Weird Study Uncovers The Confusing Solutions Concerning PD-0332991

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 08:18, 21 січня 2017, створена Net64tax (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: 32, p = 0.130, ��2 = 0.022. Interestingly, the three-way interaction between span, age-group and gender is nearly significant, F(1, 103) = 3.73, p = 0.056,...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

32, p = 0.130, ��2 = 0.022. Interestingly, the three-way interaction between span, age-group and gender is nearly significant, F(1, 103) = 3.73, p = 0.056, ��2 = 0.035. The cause of this nearly significant effect is probably due to the fact that women PD-332991 in the older adult group performed much poorer (M = 3.81) than men in the same age group and in the same backward condition (M = 4.56), and than women in the forward condition (M = 4.75). Table 1 Span and Supraspan scores in all tasks. As an alternative measure to the span score, for completeness, we compared the total number of the correctly reproduced sequences in the forward and backward condition for the two age and gender groups. Likewise, span results for score showed that Megestrol Acetate the forward score (M = 8.18; SD = 2.09) is significantly higher than the backward score (M = 6.75; SD = 2.31), F(1, 103) = 30.84, p F(1, 103) = 43.19, p GSK2118436 nmr is not significant either, F(1, 103) = 0.68, p = 0.410, ��2 = 0.007. Regarding the supraspan measure in the forward condition, results indicate that participants were able to correctly perform a significant proportion of trials containing one more item of their formal span forward, in average 24% of all the supraspan trials. Moreover, older adults (M = 33% of correct trials) were more correct than younger adults (M = 20% of correct trials), F(1, 103) = 9.33, p = 0.003, ��2 = 0.083. This data is only apparently in contrast with the superior performance of younger adults in the span tasks, because the supraspan task included, in most cases, more items for younger adults than for older adults and was therefore more difficult. Further evidence of this interpretation is the fact that when a participant scored low in the span task, it was more likely for her/him to score higher in the supraspan task, as demonstrated by the significant negative correlation between the number of items in the supraspan and the proportion of correct trials in the supraspan task, Pearson's R = ?0.662, p