Reviewed - All Autophagy Advantages As well as Drawbacks

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 22:14, 28 січня 2017, створена Knot32gallon (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: More residents from programs with sports medicine fellowships (84%, 79%, 60%, and 64%, respectively) were able to identify ankle sprain, concussion, plantar fas...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

More residents from programs with sports medicine fellowships (84%, 79%, 60%, and 64%, respectively) were able to identify ankle sprain, concussion, plantar fasciitis, and lateral epicondylitis as common injuries, and expressed comfort in treating them (94%, 80%, 93%, and 85%, respectively) compared to residents from programs with no associated sports medicine fellowship programs (81%, 75%, 58%, and 58% for identification knowledge and 93%, 76%, 89%, and 79% for treatment comfort for ankle sprain, concussion, plantar fasciitis, and lateral epicondylitis respectively). AOA-accredited programs had higher percentages Etoposide mw of residents identifying injuries as common, as well as expressing comfort in treating them, although no statistically significant differences were observed when compared to ACGME or mixed programs, except for in relation to lateral epicondylitis (P=0.03 and injuries as common, other factors that affected their training appeared not to (Table 1). Table 1 Medical training factors that did not appear to influence residents�� knowledge and comfort level in treating common sports injuries Autophagy In addition to the identification and comfort level in treatment of four common injuries based on medical training and practices, residents were asked to choose the correct answer for the treatment of a mallet finger and the correct definition of comminuted fracture. For these questions, more DOs correctly identified the definition of comminuted fractures (Pselleck chemical sports medicine fellow ships had higher numbers of residents who accurately answered the two questions compared to ACGME- and mixed-accreditation programs and programs that did not promote sports medicine fellowships. Other factors that did not appear to affect these two questions included region of the United States where a residency is located, type of residency program (university, community, mixed), area where residency is located (urban, suburban, rural), socioeconomic background of the patient population, presence of readily available guidelines for treating common sports injuries, availability of sports-injuries-specific clinics in residency, and presence of sports-medicine-trained faculty in the residency institution.