Ficain -- Recommendations On How And Why You Can Easily Reap Benefits From That

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 23:36, 1 лютого 2017, створена Yarn43angle (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: Figure?Figure6A6A indicates the net and combined effects for each task from all subjects. During walking, the combined effect of TMS and DPN stimulation on the...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Figure?Figure6A6A indicates the net and combined effects for each task from all subjects. During walking, the combined effect of TMS and DPN stimulation on the soleus H-reflex was not significantly different from the net effect evoked by separate stimuli (P?=?0.37 and 0.23 for mid and late stance, respectively). During standing, Ficain combined TMS and DPN stimulation facilitated the soleus H-reflex to a level that was significantly greater than the facilitation calculated by summing the effect of separate stimuli (P?selleck compound library of the mean control H-reflex) during walking (mid- and late stance phases) and standing from all 15 subjects tested. White columns illustrate ... To further examine the extra facilitation across tasks, multiple regression analysis was performed to test its modifications taking into account the level of change in soleus H-reflex after TMS only (corticospinal facilitation) and DPN stimulation only (reciprocal inhibition). The effect of combined stimuli on the soleus H-reflex was significantly influenced by these parameters (R2?=?0.27, P?Idelalisib concentration Further, the extra facilitation upon combined stimuli depended on the corticospinal control on soleus H-reflex but not on the level of reciprocal inhibition. A significant negative correlation between reciprocal inhibition and soleus H-reflex corticospinal facilitation (Pearson correlation analysis, R2?=?0.50, P?