Purchasing A VE-821? Look At This

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 09:51, 9 лютого 2017, створена Leek58pond (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: 31,32 Bennett-Guerrero et al conducted a multicenter randomized double-blind trial comparing high-risk cardiac surgical patients receiving a GICS with patients...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

31,32 Bennett-Guerrero et al conducted a multicenter randomized double-blind trial comparing high-risk cardiac surgical patients receiving a GICS with patients receiving a standard sternal closure. The authors found no advantages for the study group over the control group regarding the incidence of SWI up to 90 days after surgery. The GICS were soaked in saline as per the study protocol, and the authors have been criticized due to this maneuver.31 Gentamicin is a highly water-soluble molecule, and in vitro studies have showed that exposing a GICS to saline causes the loss of 6.7%, 40.5%, and 100% of the gentamicin after 2 seconds, 1 minute, and 6 hours, respectively.32 Manufacturers recommend not to soak the GICS prior to use. GICS use in High-risk Cardiac Surgery Patients Obesity represents one of the most important risk factors for the development of SWI in cardiac surgery,15 but there Azastene are contrasting data on the effect of the GICS on preventing this complication in this subgroup of patients. An important multicenter randomized controlled trial has involved Selleck VE821 1502 high-risk patients in 48 centers (Table 2).31 In this study, 1006 patients (67% of the population) were diabetic and 1137 patients (76%) were obese with a median body mass index (BMI) of 32.9 kg/m2. With a 90-day postoperative follow-up, the authors reported a comparable incidence of SWIs in the intention-to-treat analysis, with an incidence of DSWI of 8.4% in the GICS group vs 8.7% in the control group (P = 0.83). Similar results have been reported in the per-protocol analysis (8.4% vs 8.6%, P = 0.89). A further subanalysis of this study, targeting the very high-risk group and including patients who were both obese and diabetic, showed no differences between the two groups (11.1% vs 13.8%, P = 0.30). The authors concluded that the use of a GICS did not reduce the 90-day SWI rate.31 One of the most controversial points regarding this study was the fact that the GICS was wetted in saline before application: the consequence of this may have influenced mTOR inhibitor the gentamicin release,32,33 and therefore the outcome of the study would have been affected. Table 2 Comparison of various studies that have investigated GICS use in high-risk cardiac surgery patients. Different results were reported by a previously published randomized controlled trial,16 where the impact of obesity was specifically subanalyzed. With a cutoff of BMI > 25 kg/m2 (1299 patients), the authors reported a significantly reduced incidence of SSWIs (2.16% vs 6.45%, P