Preposterous Natural Product Library Insights And How They Could Very Well Have An Impact On Shoppers

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 12:01, 15 лютого 2017, створена Yarn43angle (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: Weighted data are reported for the rest of the paper. Table?1 Characteristics of all students participating in each survey, the proportion of students seeing ci...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Weighted data are reported for the rest of the paper. Table?1 Characteristics of all students participating in each survey, the proportion of students seeing cigarette packs in the previous 6?months and the proportion of these students in each of the smoking status groups (unweighted and weighted data) Brand character ratings Among students seeing a cigarette pack in the previous 6?months, those with some smoking experience gave more positive ratings for each brand in both 2011 and 2013 (table 2). However, mean character Aldosterone ratings for each brand reduced significantly between 2011 and 2013 (table 2). The reduction in mean scores was generally similar among smoking status group for the four brands (no interaction between survey year and smoking status for Winfield, Peter Jackson, Benson and Hedges, borderline significance for Longbeach (p=0.054)). Table?2 Unadjusted mean scores (SEs) on brand character ratings for students who had seen a cigarette pack in the previous 6?months in 2011 and 2013 by smoking status (weighted data) Attraction of cigarette packs Among students who had seen a cigarette pack in the previous 6?months, negative pack image ratings increased (pNatural Product Library the decrease was greater for MS (2011: 2.56; 2013: 2.18) than NSNS (2011: 1.44; 2013: 1.36) and SNS (2011: 1.84; 2013: 1.78). Table?3 Unadjusted mean scores (SEs) on positive and negative pack image ratings for 2011 and 2013 students by smoking status for students who have seen a pack in previous 6?months (weighted data) Brand differences Table?4 shows, for students who had seen a pack of cigarettes in the previous 6?months, the proportion agreeing, disagreeing or indicating ��don't know�� to the five brand differences statements. There was a significant change in the distribution of responses for four of the five statements between 2011 and 2013. For the statement ��some cigarette brands are easier to smoke than others��, there was a significant increase in the proportion responding ��don't know�� (p=0.006) and a significant decrease in the proportion ��disagreeing�� (pGDC-0973 supplier ��some brands are more addictive than others��, there was a decrease in the proportion disagreeing (p=0.02). For the statement ��some cigarette brands contain more harmful substances than others��, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of students disagreeing between 2011 and 2013 (p