Arcane Secrets That Is Related To Duvelisib That Motivated Everyone

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 05:07, 23 лютого 2017, створена Bronzeedge83 (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: The purpose of the study was to examine the associations of carbapenem resistance with mortality, length of hospital stay and hospital costs among patients infe...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

The purpose of the study was to examine the associations of carbapenem resistance with mortality, length of hospital stay and hospital costs among patients infected with A.?baumannii in intensive-care units (ICUs) in Duvelisib research buy Colombia. A prospective, multicentre cohort study was conducted among 165 patients with A.?baumannii infection admitted to ICUs between April 2006 and April 2010. Patients with carbapenem-resistant A.?baumannii had higher risk of 30-day mortality than patients with carbapenem-susceptible A.?baumannii in the univariate analysis (unadjusted hazard ratio?=?2.12; 95% CI 1.14�C3.95; p?0.018). However, carbapenem resistance was not significantly associated with risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio?=?1.45; PFI-2 mouse 95% CI 0.74�C2.87; p?0.28) after adjusting for APACHE II score and other confounding factors. We did not find a significant difference in length of stay in ICU after the onset of infection between the two groups in the multivariate analysis (adjusted mean?=?13.1?days versus 10.5?days; p?0.14). The average total cost of hospitalization among patients with carbapenem-resistant A.?baumannii was significantly higher than that among patients with carbapenem-susceptible A.?baumannii in the multivariate analysis (adjusted cost; US$?11?359 versus US$?7049; p?flupentixol ""Impact factor for 2012 has just been released. The impact factor of Clinical Microbiology and Infection increased slightly this year from 4.540 to 4.578 (Table?1). It is a marker among others, but it is more pleasant to see it evolve in a positive rather than a negative way. It is calculated based on the citations of the year 2012 on articles 2010 and 2011 divided by the number of articles in 2012. Because of backlog that had been accumulated in the time of publications, CMI issues were substantial with 421 papers published in 2009, 328 in 2010, 366 in 2011 and 385 in 2012 [1, 2]. Interestingly the impact factor has just been the subject of petition from researchers who refuse to have it used in the evaluation of their careers [3]. This is interesting but it is difficult to have a definite position on this matter. The impact factor is a witness to the quality of a journal at a given moment in a given specialty, and also reflects the number of scientists working on this field. For example in infectious diseases, a paper on AIDS has a greater chance to be a highly cited paper, as more than 7000 articles are published yearly in this field, than one on Tropheryma whipplei, the agent of Whipple's disease, with 412 articles in 20 years! (Table?2) This variation by field and domain should be taken in consideration when evaluating researchers' curriculum vitae (CV).