A Meaning Of the 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin) HCl

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 09:40, 24 лютого 2017, створена Burst58alto (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: As differences were not reflected in the comparisons of those recruits with those from other years, it would be premature to attribute the differences to recrui...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

As differences were not reflected in the comparisons of those recruits with those from other years, it would be premature to attribute the differences to recruitment from different sources. Table 4 Pairwise Selleck BEZ235 FST of adult and recruit A. elisabethae collections from 4 sites in The Bahamas. Large recruit collections across multiple years were available from CHR (6 y) and CHSL (2y). Those two sites were less than 2 km apart from each other. AMOVA of those data, comparing the two sites with adults and recruits and comparing adults to recruits crossed with years, did not identify significant differences between recruits and adults, between years nor between the two sites (Table S7). Structure analyses in which the recruits are treated as separate sets of samples (results not shown) yield results virtually identical to those using adults alone and most importantly the pattern of admixture observed in the recruits is identical to the adults and varies between sites. Given the similarity among sites along the LBB it is not surprising that assignments of recruits in Geneclass2 were almost never definitive; 46% of the assignments had probabilities less than 0.5, and only 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin) HCl 12% of the assignments had probabilities greater than 0.90. There was no difference in those proportions between the 4 sites (Chi-square test, P = 0.93). Log likelihood ratios were used to compare assignments and determine if the best assignment was a statistically (P best assignments had only marginally lower probabilities. The mean difference between the probabilities for the best and second best assignments was 0.04. Assignment to the local adult population was not always the most common source of recruits, but the majority of assignments were either to the site the recruit was collected from BLU9931 mouse or one of the nearest sites. Five replicate runs of BayesAss yielded similar results. Those analyses (Table S9) identified significantly greater than 0.0 migration from CHR to MI, GP, CHSL and EGG. All self-recruitment values were significantly greater than 0.0. The one result from the assignment tests that can be stated with certainty is that there was no evidence of migration between distant sites. While there were a small number of ��best assignments�� that fell into that category they either had low (