Entertainment News and the Critic

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 06:04, 2 березня 2017, створена Cameraperch82 (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: Entertainment news publications and online editions have sections written by critics. These could be film reviews for a film that has released at a theater near...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Entertainment news publications and online editions have sections written by critics. These could be film reviews for a film that has released at a theater near you. It could also be the music reviews for an album that is gradually climbing up the charts. Critics have been panned by artists for centuries. Many artists relegate critics to the sidelines with the powerful belief that they have taken up criticism only because they have not been able to create art themselves. But that opinion is not totally free from fallacy. Critics do their job and that job has a purpose.

The primary job of the critic is to inculcate great taste among audiences and viewers. Entertainment news portals are their media. Simply because a big chunk of the individuals read these entertainment news websites, the critics can attain out to more individuals with their views and opinion about issues. The film reviews that they write inform the audience what they can anticipate from the film. They tell you if the film ticket is worth your money or not. I am not saying that you accept their opinion as gospel truth, but when discovered critics say some thing, they must have some reason for doing so.

In the field of music, critics have a special to play as well. Music reviews inform and educate listeners about the trends of modern music. Being a connoisseur in music and performing arts, the critic manages to pack in his knowledge about music when he writes music reviews. The opinion of the critic is important for music reviews simply because the critic is well-aware of the different genres of music, be it Eastern, Western, jazz, blues or reggae. The critic pours out his knowledge on the entertainment news pages. Readers of these columns can only benefit from the learned wisdom of the critic.

Critics hold a lot of sway more than the business aspect of the entertainment industry. Viewers go to the theaters primarily on what the opinion of the film reviews is. They generally tend to head to the theaters with a pre-conceived concept formed by the reading of the critic's opinion. The same happens in case of music reviews. Sales of albums really feel the impact of a critic's analysis, and if the critic happens to be someone of repute or from a respected publication, the influence is deeper. Music reviews are also important hyperlinks in understanding the flow and path modern music is taking.

Having said all these, I'm not saying that the critic is always right in his assessment. There are many examples of movies trashed by critics in the movie reviews but they have gone on to become blockbusters. Some, which the critics hailed as cinematic masterpieces, did not find an audience. The viewer or the listener, in case of music reviews, is the ultimate judge. Critics writing for entertainment news publications can only claim to be guides. They point out particular aspects and the viewer has to decide if he agrees with the sensibilities of the critic in these elements.

Mundo articles as well as more can be located on the website.