Reality, Loss Or Nutlin-3

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 20:12, 3 березня 2017, створена Animal13neck (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: 0%) of the pregnant women (Table 2). Table 2 Distribution of pregnant women according to loss of attachment. 4.6. Dentition Status and Treatment Needs The preva...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

0%) of the pregnant women (Table 2). Table 2 Distribution of pregnant women according to loss of attachment. 4.6. Dentition Status and Treatment Needs The prevalence of dental caries among pregnant women RO4929097 was 62.7%. Tables ?Tables33 and ?and44 show mean number of teeth/person according to dentition status and treatment needs code. Table 3 Mean number of permanent teeth per person according to dentition status code. Table 4 Mean number of teeth per person according to treatment required. The mean DMFT/person in the present study was 2.13 (2.54), mean DT/person was 2.06 �� 2.5, mean MT/person was 0.03 �� 0.17, and FT/person was 0.04 (0.27). 4.7. Prosthetic Status and Prosthetic Needs In the present study, only 3 (1%) of the pregnant women had prosthesis in the upper jaw that is bridge. None of the pregnant women had prosthesis in the lower jaw. Of the 300 pregnant women examined, 288 (96.0%) pregnant women did not require any prosthesis in the upper jaw, 09 (3.0%) required one-unit prosthesis, 02 (0.7%) required multiunit prosthesis, and 01 (0.3%) required a combination of one- and/or multiunit prosthesis in the upper jaw. Similarly, 272 (90.7%) pregnant women did not require a prosthesis in the lower jaw, INPP5D 19 (6.3%) required one-unit prosthesis, 04 (1.3%) required multiunit prosthesis in the lower jaw, and 05 (1.7%) required a combination of one- and/or multiunit prosthesis in the lower jaw. 4.8. Need for Immediate Care and Referral There was a need for immediate care and referral for 10 (3.3%) of the subjects who presented with oral submucous fibrosis, 01 (3.3%) pregnant woman who presented with leukoplakia, and 56 (18.7%) pregnant women who presented with either pain or infection due to www.selleckchem.com/products/Nutlin-3.html dental caries. 4.9. Oral Hygiene Status (Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified) The Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified was assessed for all the 300 pregnant women; 46 (15.3%) had good oral hygiene, 122 (40.7%) had fair oral hygiene, and 132 (44.0%) had poor oral hygiene, with mean debris-index simplified score being 1.59 (0.58), mean calculus-index simplified score being 1.28 (0.77), and the mean Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified score per person being 2.87 (1.29). 4.10. Gestational Age and Community Periodontal Index, Periodontal Loss of Attachment, and Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified Statistically significant association between gestational age and periodontal condition of the pregnant women was seen (p