Sneaky Details On Forskolin Uncovered

Differently than in Experiment 1, participants in the control condition imagined positive risk consequences of five risky situations instead of solving arithmetic problems. Each risky situation was followed by six questions concerning emotions evoked by negative risk consequences (three questions), risk perception (two questions), and the intensity of mental images of risk (one question). Sitaxentan Responses were provided on a 10-point scale (the exact wording of these questions and descriptive statistics are presented in Table ?Table2).2). Similar to Experiment 1, at the end of this experiment participants were also asked to recall risky situations presented in the study. Table 2 Descriptive statistics for measures used in Experiment 2. Results Manipulation check Intensity of mental images of risk consequences did not differ between negative and positive imagery conditions, b = ?0.13, p = 0.641 (Table ?(Table2).2). Moreover, we did not find any significant differences in the recall of risky situations, t(120) = 0.687, p = 0.494, nor in time spent on completing the procedure, t(122) = ?0.949, p = 0.344, which suggest that participants were equally involved in processing risky situations regardless of the experimental condition (positive vs. negative risk consequences). Testing for the indirect effect of negative affect Similar to Experiment Forskolin cell line 1, three measures of emotions were averaged in the way that higher values indicated more intense negative affect. Two measures of the perceived risk were used to compute the measure of risk perception (higher values indicated higher perceived riskiness). We found that participants who imagined negative consequences of risk, in comparison to participants imagining positive risk consequences, reported more negative affect, a = 2.58, p Selleckchem CX5461 by imagining negative consequences of risk. Monte Carlo 95% CIs for the indirect effect are based on 10,000 samples. Discussion Experiment 2 showed that imagining negative, but not positive, consequences of risk influenced risk perception. That is, participants who visualized negative risk consequences rated perceived risk as higher, compared to the control condition, and this relationship was mediated by negative affect. Crucially, we did not find any differences in either the recall of risky situations or in the intensity of mental images of positive or negative risk consequences.