You Don't Need To Be Fluvoxamine Addicted To Get Stung

e., Dot-Congruent, Dot-Incongruent, Letter-Congruent, and Letter-Incongruent), the distribution of by-subject means did not violate the assumption of normality (Kolmogorov�CSmirnov ps > 0.05). In addition, for each click here of these three dependent measures, the differences between the means of the Congruent and Incongruent conditions for the dot and letter prompts, too, did not violate the assumption of normality (Kolmogorov�CSmirnov ps > 0.20). Nevertheless, for the sake of thoroughness and because some distributions of values appeared leptokurtic and highly skewed, and because, for three particular conditions (i.e., urges to err for the Letter-Congruent, and error rates for the Dot-Congruent condition and Letter-Congruent condition), the Kolmogorov�CSmirnov ps did approach significance (ps = 0.06), we provide in this section, where appropriate and in addition to the results from our parametric tests, the results from comparable non-parametric tests, which are more conservative. We also provide information about the kurtosis and skewness of each distribution. For urges to err, the skewness of each distribution was: Dot-Congruent = 1.66, Dot-Incongruent = 1.00, Letter-Congruent = 2.15, and Letter-Incongruent = 1.91. For this same measure, the kurtosis for each distribution was: Dot-Congruent = 2.25, Dot-Incongruent = 0.22, Letter-Congruent = 4.38, and Letter-Incongruent = 3.54. Error Rates Again, as in the case of our pilot study, subjects were capable of performing the task: http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Pazopanib-Hydrochloride.html the mean proportion of errors across the 384 trials Fluvoxamine was 0.04 (SD = 0.028). See error rates for all conditions in Table ?Table11. Unlike in our pilot study, error rates varied by condition: in a fully within-subjects ANOVA with Congruence (Congruent versus Incongruent) as one factor and Prompt (dot versus letter) as the other factor, there was a main effect of Congruence, F(1,63) = 22.88, p