9 Questions Should Certainly Be Asked When It Comes To Lumacaftor

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 10:45, 14 квітня 2017, створена Yarn43angle (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: A survival analysis (Kaplan�CMeier) and a Cox regression analysis were performed. Results: Twenty-three restorations in 20 patients (8.26%, 95% CI 4.8�C11.7...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

A survival analysis (Kaplan�CMeier) and a Cox regression analysis were performed. Results: Twenty-three restorations in 20 patients (8.26%, 95% CI 4.8�C11.7) showed at least one fracture (7.39%). More than half of the new fractures (52%, 12 cases) occurred in the first 4 weeks. The cumulative survival probability observed was greater in mandible (P=0.05) and non-cantilever restorations (P=0.001), and in those opposed by full restorations or natural teeth (P=0.001). With an opposing implant-supported prosthesis, the risk of fracture was multiplied by 4.7, and the use of cantilevers as well as the location of the restoration in the maxilla multiply www.selleckchem.com/products/VX-809.html the risk by 3.4�C3.5. Conclusions: Immediate provisional screw-retained metal-free implant-supported restorations can be considered a reliable restoration (92.6% remain intact) for the healing period of 3 months. To cite this article: Suarez-Feito JM, Sicilia A, Angulo J, Banerji S, Cuesta I, Millar B. Clinical performance of provisional screw-retained metal-free acrylic restorations in an immediate loading implant protocol: a 242 consecutive patients' report. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 1360�C1369. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01956.x ""To describe the peri-implant condition of unselected Resminostat implant recall patients, to relate it to relevant features from the patient medical history, and to look at associations across these findings. Prior to their most recent recall appointment, 74 individuals underwent a clinical and microbiological (PCR) investigation. Signs of a serious peri-implantitis condition were not encountered in this patient cohort. However, a high prevalence of moderate plaque and bleeding on probing (60% and 78%, respectively) and PCR proof of periodonto-pathogenic bacteria (43% positive for one or more target species) was apparent. The mean pocket probing depth was 2.9?mm. The by far most prominent co-morbidity belonged to the group of patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD; 27%). CVD were statistically significantly associated with the prevalence and concentration Baf-A1 order of Prevotella intermedia in the peri-implant sulcus (P?=?0.022). Age was positively associated with plaque load (P?