Dirty Details Of BKM120 Exposed

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 09:28, 17 квітня 2017, створена Leek58pond (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: This analysis assessed the efficacy of FP/FORM versus FP in patients who had previously received ICS therapy. Methods?Data were pooled [http://en.wikipedia.org/...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

This analysis assessed the efficacy of FP/FORM versus FP in patients who had previously received ICS therapy. Methods?Data were pooled Oxygenase from 5 randomized studies in patients with asthma (aged ��12 years) treated for 8 or 12 weeks with FP/FORM (100/10, 250/10 or 500/20?��g b.i.d.; N?=?528) or FP alone (100, 250 or 500?��g b.i.d.; N?=?527). Results?FP/FORM significantly (p?BKM120 manufacturer pre-dose FEV1, L 2.034 vs. 2.034 Pre-dose FEV1, L n?=?525; n?=?524 Changeb 0.205 (0.163, 0.247) vs. 0.157 (0.115, 0.198) Treatment differencec 0.048 (0.002, 0.095) 2 h post-dose FEV1, L n?=?527; n?=?521 Changeb 0.377 (0.338, 0.416) vs. 0.231 (0.192, NU7441 order 0.271) Treatment differencec 0.146 (0.101, 0.190) Asthma control days, % n?=?519; n?=?510 Baselinea 13.3 vs. 12.1 Changeb 48.6 (44.9, 52.4) vs. 40.1 (36.3, 43.9) Treatment differencec 8.6 (4.2, 12.9) Any exacerbation n?=?528; n?=?527 Patients, % 29.9 vs. 36.6 Odds ratio (95%CI) 0.74 (0.57, 0.95) Annualized rate 3.6 vs. 5.0 Rate ratio (95%CI) 0.71 (0.54, 0.94) aMean; bLeast-squares mean (LSM) from baseline to study end (95%CI); cLSM (95%CI). JUNKO SAJI1, MOTONAKA ARAI1, TAKAHITO YAMAMOTO1, MASAMICHI MINESHITA2, TERUOMI MIYAZAWA2 1Division of Respiratory Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan, 2Division of Respiratory and Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan Background and Aim of Study?The efficacy of omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody, has been studied in patients with severe bronchial asthma. It has been reported that omalizumab was unable to improve objective results; however, improvements were seen for subjective symptoms in asthmatic patients.