Who Should Have A Chunk Of Autophagy Compound Library ?

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 15:10, 22 квітня 2017, створена Mittenedge34 (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: These clustered flow cells were then subjected to the sequencing analysis in an Illumina HiSeq 2000 system. Each library was sequenced with an average 27-fold g...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

These clustered flow cells were then subjected to the sequencing analysis in an Illumina HiSeq 2000 system. Each library was sequenced with an average 27-fold genome coverage and with paired-end runs for 200-cycle analysis. We used Bismark software28 version 0.6.3 to align paired-end?bisulfite-treated DNA reads against the UCSC human reference genome build Autophagy Compound Library order hg19 (http://genome.ucsc.edu, last accessed April 14, 2013). Bismark generated the BS-seq reference from build hg19 containing C-to-T conversion for the forward strand and G-to-A conversion for the reverse strand. Sequencing batches with more than 7% non-CpG unconverted cytosine were excluded from further analysis. Uniquely best-mapped reads were pooled with at most two mismatches and fragment size of mate pairs ranging from 400 to 1400 bp. The methylation extractor tool in Bismark called all cytosine methylation status of each CG. After methylation calling, we characterized the methylation strength of each CpG island and of 200-bp moving windows of the human whole genome in terms of the �� value, calculated as �� = Total selleck number of methylated calls in region/(Total number of methylated calls in region + Total number of unmethylated calls in region). RNA-seq reads were at an average 1000�� coverage. Whole-genome RNA-seq reads were aligned with TopHat software29?and?30 version 1.4.1 against the UCSC reference genome build hg19, allowing two mismatches per any 100-bp read. TopHat used uniquely mapped reads (against the reference genome) and the genomic database (UCSC hg19 Gene Annotation) to build up a potential splicing sites database. Borrowing information from potential splicing sites, isoforms were determined. We then used Cufflinks software29?and?31 version 1.3.0 to calculate the fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM) to measure the abundance of the transcripts for pair-end reads and obtained a gene-based FPKM value that summarized all isoforms in a given gene. Moving windows (200 bp) on the whole human genome (build hg19) were used to study methylation differences in different regions among the different groups (T, AT, and OD). Fisher��s exact test was used to assess the significance of differential methylation. A moving window was determined to be differentially methylated Laccase if the difference between the average �� value of two groups was >0.4 and the adjusted P value from Fisher��s exact test (false discovery rate controlled by Benjamini�CHochberg procedure) was