How To Become A real Alisertib Sensei

At the end of the experiment, we presented all 12 stimuli associated with the different trial types, separately for the flanker and Stroop task, and asked participants to rate how difficult �C on average �C it appeared to them to respond quickly and accurately to the respective trial when that stimulus was presented in the two task blocks of the task they did before. Participants reported perceived difficulty on a find more 9-points scale ranging from very easy to very difficult. Results Subjective Reports Analyses were run on the mean difficulty rating of all conflict (incongruent) and no-conflict (congruent) trials, for the Stroop and flanker task separately. In line with the task difficulty ratings of Experiments 1 and 2, a main effect of task revealed that trials in the Stroop task were rated to be more difficult than the flanker task [3.6 versus 3.2; F(1,154 = 10.2, p = 0.002, MSE = 2.3]. A main effect of congruency showed that incongruent trials were rated to be more difficult than congruent trials [4.2 versus 2.6; F(1,154 = 260.7, p congruency-sequence effects (see Figure ?Figure11). That is, a significant reduction of the congruency effect following conflict was found for the Stroop task [14 ms; F(1,154) = 7.1, p = 0.009, MSE = 1021.0] and a tendency for this effect was observed in the flanker task [9 ms; F(1,154) = 3.5, p = 0.064, MSE = 806.0]. Accuracy data also showed basic congruency effects for the Stroop task [2.7%; F(1,154) = 33.1, p