Traumatic Information Regarding Temsirolimus

The fitting was quantified in terms of the total surface area, and the CYTH4 maximum distance (in the axial plane) by which the nail was protruding from the medullary cavity of the virtual model. To calculate the nail's total surface area that was outside the medullary cavity the inner cortex surface model was computer graphically subtracted from the nail model. The maximum distance of nail protrusion was measured in the axial plane as shown in Fig. 3. For all bone models the fitting was quantified for the unreamed case. A two-sided paired t-test was used to test for statistical significance. In all 20 bone models, the total area of the nail protruding from the medullary cavity was smaller for the ETN-Proximal-Bend (mean: 540?mm2; SD: 693?mm2; range: 0�C3003?mm2) compared to the ETN (mean: 1044?mm2; SD: 612?mm2; range: 273�C3114?mm2). Also, the maximum distance of the nail protruding from the medullary cavity was smaller for the ETN-Proximal-Bend (mean: 1.2?mm; SD: 1.3?mm; range: 0�C4.8?mm) compared to the ETN (mean: 2.7?mm; SD: 1.8?mm; range: 0.5�C7.5?mm). The differences were statistically significant (p?Sirolimus price all 20 bones, the extent to which this occurred was not uniform across the dataset as seen in Table 1. This indicates, that even with an improved design, a single nail shape might not be sufficient to achieve an anatomical fitting for all bones. Based on the obtained results, we were not able to establish any relationship or pattern which would differentiate the specimens for which the area and max distance were larger (above the mean) than the rest. However, it is to be noted that we have used a relatively small dataset of 20 bone models. For Bone no. 16 the smallest nail diameter of 8?mm was still too large for the medullary cavity Temsirolimus clinical trial which resulted in the considerably larger total surface area of nail protrusion compared to the values obtained for the other bone models. For all the other tibia models, it is unlikely that reaming would have any significant effect on the obtained results, as the reamer would not have widened the medullary cavity in the areas of poor fit as seen in Fig. 3. For all bone models, the nail protrusion occurred on the posterior side in the middle third of the tibia as seen in Fig. 3. For 12 bones, the protrusion was slightly lateral to the centre of the shaft as in Fig. 3. The protrusions were centred on the shaft for seven bones and medial to the centre for one bone.