The Astounding Carboplatin Cheat Which Could Fool Just About All

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 08:19, 28 травня 2017, створена Drawer9parade (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: The fracture patterns were more evenly distributed (Table 1?and?Table 2). Open fractures occurred in only three subjects (1.5%). Of the 197 subjects reviewed, a...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

The fracture patterns were more evenly distributed (Table 1?and?Table 2). Open fractures occurred in only three subjects (1.5%). Of the 197 subjects reviewed, a total of 39 presented with associated injuries (20%). Of these, most had injuries at multiple sites; there were a total of 111 associated injuries. Bilateral Carboplatin injuries to paired organs were considered one injury in tabulating these results. The majority of the associated injuries were fractures (27.9%), followed by internal organ injuries (18.0%), closed head injuries (14.4%) and soft tissue injuries (13.5%) (Fig. 2). The locations of the associated injuries varied significantly. The vast majority occurred in the head and neck (29.7%), followed by lower leg (15.3%), thorax (12.6%), and abdomen (11.7%). The types of associated injuries are recorded in Table 3. One tibia fracture and one hand fracture were open fractures. Seven of the one hundred and eleven associated injuries had a delayed diagnosis (6%). One patient had two injuries that were delayed in diagnosis, with six patients in all having an injury missed (3%). A list of the missed injuries can be seen in Table 4. With so few missed injuries, we were unable to run any meaningful statistical analyses in attempts to correlate them to patient age or gender, injury mechanism or fracture characteristics. The mechanism of injury was related to the presence or absence of an associated injury in a statistically significant way (p?BI 6727 supplier DZNeP datasheet of injury, we divided our subjects into three groups (ages 0�C5, 6�C12, and ��13 years). There is a statistically significant difference between the age groups based on the energy level involved in the injury (p?=?0.002). Lower energy mechanisms of injury were seen more frequently in the younger age group ( Fig. 3). There was no significant correlation between gender and mechanism of injury. The location of the femur fracture in the shaft (proximal, middle, distal) was not related to the mechanism of injury in any significant way. The fracture pattern and injury mechanism were related, however (p?