The Men Who Actually Sold His Personal Amiloride Novel For A Million Dollars

78, SD?=?0.30). These two occupation conditions were significantly different [t(14)?=?11.49; p?Amiloride (cf. Supplementary Material, for example). The stories were presented in random order. To control for prosody, stimuli were presented on a sheet of paper. Each stimulus was placed in front of the participant and remained there throughout the reading and questioning so that participants did not have to remember it. This was done in order to minimize memory and attention requirements. In line with the study by Pexman and Olineck (44), participants were asked to read each of these 48 stimuli and then answer the following question: ��What does X (the speaker) really mean?�� Then, they had to judge on a 7-point scale if the speaker was being ironic (1?=?not at all ironic, 7?=?extremely ironic), if he/she was mocking someone (1?=?not at all mocking, 7?=?extremely mocking), Ruxolitinib cost and if he/she was saying something polite (1?=?not at all polite, 7?=?extremely polite). Rating scales on irony and mockery were used to assess attribution of Vemurafenib supplier speaker intent while the question on politeness was used to assess social perception. All participants were tested individually over one session in a quiet room. Data analysis The data were analyzed using 2 groups (SZ, HC)?��?2 statements (ironic, literal)?��?2 speaker occupations (sarcastic, non-sarcastic) repeated-measures ANOVA. A Spearman correlation analysis was conducted on the performances (i.e., percentage of correct responses to the question on the speaker iconic intent, irony rating scale, mocking rating scale, politeness rating scale) of the SZ group for each condition to examine the relationship between ToM and symptoms. The alpha level was set at p?