The Beneficial, The Not So Good And also Buparlisib

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 14:45, 19 червня 2017, створена Leek58pond (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: Support needs to be tailored and more flexible in terms of duration and intensity and standard NHS SSS monitoring and success criteria, such as measuring 4-week...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Support needs to be tailored and more flexible in terms of duration and intensity and standard NHS SSS monitoring and success criteria, such as measuring 4-week quit rates, are not appropriate and need broadening for this population. Further research with long-term follow-up to explore Cut Down To Quit and relapse prevention strategies are needed. This research was carried out as part of a programme of inequalities projects implemented by the UK Centre for Tobacco Oxacillin Control Studies and funded by the Department of Health. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare. ""6777" "The UK government is changing its system of payment for drug treatment services in order to reward the achievement of better patient outcomes. This is a model that may be taken up internationally. This ��payment by results�� funding system will reward providers for achieving good outcomes in terms of whether clients are drug free, employed and/or not convicted of a criminal offence. Providers will also receive a payment based on health and wellbeing outcome measurement. The definition and measurement of success in achieving these outcomes is complex and challenging, Buparlisib as is the need to bridge treatment costs during the period in which outcomes are pursued. This experiment requires careful evaluation if the delivery of drug treatment is not to be jeopardized or fragmented. ""6778" "Aims? This study aimed to examine the associations between reported exposure to anti-smoking warnings at the point-of-sale (POS) and smokers' interest in quitting and their subsequent quit attempts by comparing reactions in Australia where warnings are prominent to smokers in other countries. Design? A prospective multi-country cohort design was employed. Setting? Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. Participants? A total of 21?613 adult smokers who completed at least one of the seven waves (2002�C08) of the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey were included in the analysis. Measurements? Reported exposure to POS anti-smoking warnings and smokers' interest in quitting at the same wave and quit attempts over the following year. Findings? Compared to smokers in Canada, the United click here Kingdom and the United States, Australian smokers reported higher levels of awareness of POS anti-smoking warnings, and this difference was consistent over the study period. Over waves in Australia (but not in the other three countries) there was a significantly positive association between reported exposure to POS anti-smoking warnings and interest in quitting [adjusted odds ratio?=?1.139, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.039�C1.249, P?