Stated Buildup Around Mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 08:58, 23 червня 2017, створена Drawer9parade (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: Recall of [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/MG132.html Selleck MG132] storyline events did not differ between viewers who donated an organ and those who did...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Recall of Selleck MG132 storyline events did not differ between viewers who donated an organ and those who did not (��2 [1, n = 1134] = 0.56, P = 0.452), viewers who received an organ and those who did not (��2 [1, n = 1140] = 0.64, P = 0.423), viewers who have a close friend or family member who has donated/received an organ and those who do not (��2 [1, n = 1134] = 0.57, P = 0.452), or viewers who are donation/transplant professionals and those who are not (��2 [1, n = 1170] = 2.13, P = 0.145). Table II. Demographics of study participants Recall of events and myth rejection The series of ANOVAs showed several differences between respondents who scored high on recall and those who scored low. By testing H1, Table III shows that viewers with high recall of events in Three Rivers are more likely to reject four of the seven myths. High recall viewers rejected the myth that there is a black market selling organs from deceased donors in the United States (F [1, 1243] = 6.43, P = 0.011), that the rich, famous and powerful people move to the front of the line when they need an organ transplant (F [1, 1246] = 4.78, P = 0.029), that their family will be charged by the hospital if they donate their organs (F [1, 1242] = 6.55, P = 0.011), and that in case they want their loved one to have an open-casket funeral, this cannot happen if his or her organs or tissues have been donated (F [1, 1244] = 10.33, P = 0.001). High recall viewers were as likely as low recall viewers to reject the myths that doctors decide which patients get the organ, that doctors do not work as hard to save a patient who is an organ donor as one who is not, and that organ donation is against one��s religion (Table III). Table III. Comparisons between individuals who highly recall story events and those who poorly recall story events with respect to their rejection of myths Positive discussion The present study posits that recall of story events (H3) and viewers�� rejection of the three myths presented in the storyline (H2) is related to their tendency to positively discuss organ donation and the storyline with others. The results of the zero-order correlations (Table IV) indicate significant relationships between all hypothesized predictors and PID. Regression results (model 1; Table V) support H3 and reveal that while considering demographic factors, registration status, and membership to the community, recall of events was significantly associated with more PID (�� = 0.08, P