No doubt continue to flourish.Aristotle (1999/330 BC). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. T.

Indianapolis, IN: ATP-polyamine-biotin supplier Hackett. This definition highlights the complexity of behavior when it comes to "systemic emergence" from micro to macro elements (Serra and Zanarini, 2012; Liu et al., 2013; Reynolds, 2014). Modeling behavior is possible in the micro level via computational neuroscience and in the macro level (society) through computational psychology (e.g., social network analysis and mathematical modeling). Having said that, the genuine problem for researcher is to recognize to what extent realistic behavior could be modeled, as behavior is relational, dynamic, and multidimensional (Gomez-Marin et al., 2014). Moreover, behavior is manifested in various types, such as gestures, expressions, and psychophysiological modifications. Due to the complicated nature of behavior (Bieri, 1955; Cambel, 1993; Robertson and Combs, 2014), its modeling cannot be according to a mixture of variables in equations (Cushing, 2013; Puccia and Levins, 2013). Instead, the relational, dynamic, and multidimensional nature of behavior must beFrontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.orgNovember 2015 | Volume six | ArticleCipressoModeling behavior dynamicsstudied below the umbrella of complicated systems, employing computational science (Thelen and Smith, 1996, 2007; Vespignani, 2012; Goertzel, 2013; Liu et al., 2013).No doubt continue to flourish.Aristotle (1999/330 BC). Nicomachean Ethics, trans. T. Irwin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. Barrett, L. F. (2006a). Solving the emotion paradox: categorization plus the knowledge of emotion. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. ten, 20?six. doi: ten.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2 Barrett, L. F. (2006b). Valence is really a simple constructing block of emotional life. J. Res. Pers. 40, 35?five. doi: 10.1037/a0024081 Barrett, L. F., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K. N., and Gross, J. J. (2007). The experience of emotion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 373?03. doi: ten.1146/annurev. psych.58.110405.085709 Bartels, D. M. (2008). Principled moral sentiment plus the flexibility of moral judgment and choice creating. Cognition 108, 381?17. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.001 Bartels, D. M., and Pizarro, D. A. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition 121, 154?61. doi: ten.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.Beyond BiasClaims of people's deviation from normative or rational models of behavior abound in the psychological literature. As Krueger and Funder (2004) have shown, bias is usually implied both by pattern X and by pattern not X, leaving it near not possible to find out unbiased behavior. As 1 example, viewing oneself more favorably than other people constitutes a bias (self-enhancement), as does viewing oneself much less favorably (self-effacement). The emphasis on bias, and its supposed ubiquity, similarly exists inside the moral judgment literature. Haidt (2001, p. 822) notes that "moral reasoning just isn't left free to search for truth but is likely to be hired out like a lawyer by numerous motives," Within a current article, Gomez-Marin et al. (2014) defined animal behavior as "the macroscopic expression of neural activity, implemented by muscular and glandular contractions acting around the physique, and resulting in egocentric and allocentric alterations in an organized temporal sequence" (p. 1456). This definition highlights the complexity of behavior in terms of "systemic emergence" from micro to macro elements (Serra and Zanarini, 2012; Liu et al., 2013; Reynolds, 2014). Modeling behavior is feasible at the micro level by means of computational neuroscience and in the macro level (society) by way of computational psychology (e.g., social network analysis and mathematical modeling).