= 0.99). Concerning productivity from institutions, the

Institution which ranked very first had the highest total citation although these in rank number ten had the least total citations. Similar connection existed in between rank in the institution plus the h-index (r = - 0.913, p 0.01). Concerning best productive authors, no considerable dominance was noticed and most authors in the prime ten list had research productivity between 142 http://www.tongji.org/members/susan66jumbo/activity/241869/ articles (Table five). On the other hand, the majority of authors (90 ) inside the prime ten list have been in the USA though the last one particular in the list was from Spain. Prime ten productive authors is shown in Table 5. There was no important correlation (p > 0.05) among the rank of your authorand the percentage of very cited articles published by the authors.Citation evaluation and most cited articlesA total of 1702 (75.07 ) articles have been cited no less than once; the remaining articles were not cited at all. Cited articles had been additional analyzed working with VOSviewer to create visualization maps. Co-authorship analysis making use of VOSviewer showed 3 clusters of authors (Fig. three). Cluster quantity a single included 14 authors, three of them were amongst the prime ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships). Authors with greater quantity of co-authorships had greater collaboration compared with those with reduce quantity of co-authorships. Additionally, authors within the identical cluster are these with closer collaboration in comparison with authors who exist in other clusters. Cluster quantity two integrated 12 authors, one particular of them was from the top ten productive authors; Colford Jr, J.M (17 co-authorships). Cluster number 3 integrated 11 authors, 4 of them have been within the top rated ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The major cited articles are shown in Table six [6, 7, 9, 217]. The prime cited post was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The post was published inside the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide research productivity on water related ailments utilizing the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B three.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95 Wald Confidence Interval for Exp(B) Reduced 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: quantity of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values on the coefficientsSweileh et al. Even so, no studies have already been carried out to assess the all round health elements of unsafe drinking or recreational water. Bibliometric analysis on water in general and water technologies have been also carried out without having focusing on wellness connected issues [314]. Our study showed that there is a expanding interest and investigation activity on this topic manifested as an rising trend in the quantity of publications particularly within the final decade.= 0.99). Regarding productivity from institutions, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Centers for Illness Prevention and Handle (CDC) ranked initially and second respectively (Table 4). Six with the prime ten productive institutions have been based inside the USA, a single was WHO, though the remaining 3 were primarily based in the UK, Germany and Taiwan.