PFC (five cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.six Hz 1 single train 540 pulses

"Avoid threat" combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment process: Decreased AB to threat (Continued)Clarke et al.,Parallel Sham controlled "Attend threat" ABM + active tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + active tDCS17 (7)19.L DLPFC/L superior trapezius (10/20 EEG)1 mA mean 17 min 24 cm1. AB assessment process with neutral and threatening words (t0, t1)20 (6)19.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | Volume 9 | ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued References Study design N (Males) Mean age in years 20.6 Web site of stimulation* NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) Main results"Attend threat" ABM + sham tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + sham tDCS Feeser et al., 2014 Parallel sham controlled tDCS applied through emotional regulation (4 situations: preserve neutral feelings, downregulate, upregulate, or preserve unfavorable emotions)22 (7)18 (8)19.42 (20)28.R DLFPC/L supraorbital area (10/20 EEG)1.5 mA 20 min Anodal: 35 cm2 Cathodal: one hundred cm1. Arousal ratings on IAPS images (t0.5) 2. Skin conductance response (t0.five) 3. Gaze fixation (t0.5) four. Multidimensional State Questionnaire (t0, t1)Active vs. Sham tDCS: 1. Arousal ratings: Reduced within the downregulation circumstances. Higher and inside the unfavorable retain in the upregulation condition 2. Skin conductance: Reduce response in the downregulation condition. Greater response within the upregulation condition 3. Gaze fixation: No impact four. Multidimensional State Questionnaire: No effect* Web page of stimulation is supplied as follows, for rTMS: coil position, for tDCS: anode/cathode position. The process made use of to define the target is offered as follows, (10/20 EEG), Electrode placements according to 10/20 EEG system; (MRI BN), Magnetic Resonance Imaging based neuronavigation. ** NIBS parameters are offered as follows, for rTMS: frequency, trains quantity and duration, ITI, number of pulses, intensity, for tDCS: intensity, duration, electrode size. AB, Attentional bias; ABM, Attentional bias modification job; ACC, Anterior cingulate cortex; AGN, Affective go-no-go; AIT, Arithmetic Ganetespib inhibition task; BDI, Beck depression inventory; BISBAS, Behavioral inhibition technique and behavioral approach method; Cz, Central midline; DLPFC, Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; DWM, Delayed response STA-9090 price functioning memory task; IAPS, International affective picture technique; ITI, Intertrain interval; L, Left; M1, Left major motor cortex; M2, Appropriate principal motor cortex; MT, Motor threshold; N, quantity of subjects; NAP, Damaging affective priming; NIBS, Non-invasive brain stimulation; NIMH, National institute of mental well being; OFC, Orbitofrontal cortex; O1, Left occipital cortex; O2, Correct occipital cortex; PANAS, Good affect and unfavorable impact schedule; PASAT.PFC (five cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.6 Hz 1 single train 540 pulses 130 MT1. Emotional Stroop process with neutral and angry faces (t10) 2. POMS-32 (t0, t1)tDCS studies Wolkenstein et al., 2014 Crossover Sham controlled 28 (8) 30.9 R deltoid/L DLPFC (10/20 EEG) 1 mA 20 min 35 cm2 1. DWM (t0.5) two. AIT with constructive, neutral and unfavorable pictures (t1) 3. PANAS (t0, t1) Active vs. sham tDCS: 1. DWM: Lowered accuracy for damaging vs. neutral and positive pictures two. AIT: Longer RT for negative vs. neutral and good photos 3. title= title= 1471-2474-14-48 target='resource_window'>fpsyg.2016.01448 PANAS: No impact "Attend threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs.