55.42c 0.(0.006) -0.014 (0.003) 5.488c (0.815) four,963 0.090 29.60c 0.000 two.249 0.(0.009) -0.014 (0.008) 1.803a (1.043) 5,619 0.170 50.140c 0.000 0.865b 0.(0.019) -0.022 (0.014) 1.901 (2.362) 1,601 0.123 18.28c 0.000 0.278 0.(0.018) -

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 09:21, 26 грудня 2017, створена Radishstudy17 (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: 55.42c 0.(0.006) -0.014 (0.003) 5.488c (0.815) 4,963 0.090 29.60c 0.000 two.249 0.(0.009) -0.014 (0.008) 1.803a (1.043) five,619 0.170 50.140c 0.000 0.865b 0.(0...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

55.42c 0.(0.006) -0.014 (0.003) 5.488c (0.815) 4,963 0.090 29.60c 0.000 two.249 0.(0.009) -0.014 (0.008) 1.803a (1.043) five,619 0.170 50.140c 0.000 0.865b 0.(0.019) -0.022 (0.014) 1.901 (two.362) 1,601 0.123 18.28c 0.000 0.278 0.(0.018) -0.022 (0.015) three.847b (1.653) 2,939 0.158 40.23c 0.000 1.006b 0.(0.019) -0.045 (0.021) 4.626b (two.175) 1,941 -0.002 31.92c 0.000 0.757a 0.-0.019 (0.010) 1.824 (1.140) 2,163 0.014 24.70c 0.000 0.741a 0.-0.012 (0.004) 6.792c (0.868) three,569 0.147 32.27c 0.000 0.069a 0.-0.000 (0.005) 8.043c (1.433) 2,496 0.141 31.92c 0.000 1.349 0.15.138c 2.810a 0.000 0.Web page 7 ofTable three Second stage IV-2SLS regression for satisfaction with lifea (Continued)Underidentif. test Chi-sq (p-value) Sargan statistic Chi-sq (p-value) 254.15c 0.000 130.08c 0.000 247.199c 279.27c 0.000 14.049 0.012 0.000 17.379a 0.053 215.29c 284.69c 503.37c 223.98c 0.000 12.635 0.179 0.278 6.622 0.674 0.000 0.000 17.109b 19.342b 0.050 0.032 297.89c 0.000 17.849b 0.037 280.66c 0.000 four.290c 0.000 title= INF.0000000000000821 462.25c 0.000 five.662 0.773 151.13c 189.46c 0.000 9.439 0.306 0.000 2.308 0.679 153.21c 0.000 six.387 0.172 151.14c 0.000 2.633 0.621 556.04c 0.000 six.579 0.Tomini et al. BMC Geriatrics (2016) 16:14.1762a 13.439 0.077 0.Notes: asignificant at 10 ; bsignificant at five ; csignificant at 1 ; Standard deviations in parentheses; dInstrumented variable is composition of network (share of reported quantity of buddies more than the total number of persons inside the network); Other manage variables integrated:, Age squared, Variety of vehicles, At the moment residing in a nurseryPage 8 ofTomini et al. BMC Geriatrics (2016) 16:Web page 9 ofshare of close friends inside the network. Both models show similar trends (with only some Encorafenib price exceptions). Therefore, age is (typically) positively connected with satisfaction with life (benefits are statistically significant for all nations within the initial model and for many in the countries in the second 1 regardless of displaying some non-linear Lorcaserin (Hydrochloride) patterns). Getting the partner within the exact same household increases satisfaction with life and outcomes are mostly statistically considerable. As expected, the larger scores around the scales of issues with ADL affected negatively life satisfaction of folks in all selected European countries. You can find some variations among the countries on the size from the coefficients. By way of example, by far the most negative ones are observed in Southern European nations like Italy and Portugal but also in Central and Eastern European nations like Switzerland and Hungary. Individuals within the highest revenue quintile are far more satisfied with life than those within the reduced quintiles. Results are constant more than most of the European nations. Again, we observe some inter nation variations exactly where coefficients for the highest quintiles in nations like Hungary, Slovenia and Estonia are much greater than in Netherlands or Sweden (where coefficients are adverse title= journal.pone.0054688 but not statistically significant).