Gher for the "recently selected" group in comparison with all the "non-
Gher for the "recently selected" group in comparison title= fnhum.2013.00686 together with the "non-(recently) selected" group. Tatement was followed in writing this report.RESULTSThe database search retrieved Further ANCOVAs, comparing only selected students (i.e. Y1selection, Y4selection and GE-Y1), revealed the same pattern. Strength of motivation for health-related college (F = 18.720, p = 0.000, Cohen's d = 0.47, effect size smaller to medium), autonomous motivation (F = 12.248, p = 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.62, impact size medium to large), and controlled motivation (F = 6.647, p = 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.84, impact size Gher for the "recently selected" group in comparison with all the "non- significant) have been considerably larger for Y1selection students and GE-Y1 students in comparison using the Y4selection students. The effect sizes for the variations in autonomous and controlled motivation improved when the not too long ago chosen students have been compared with only the students who were chosen three years ago."By getting part of a special group" "Because becoming a part of a group of lucky individuals is an honour" "Because I got the opportunity to study what I generally wanted" "Because the selection is difficult, you reflect on why you would like this so badly" "... and you are frequently asked about your motivation by your atmosphere and by yourself"Getting acquainted with course material Result of effort"During selection you could possibly already get a taste in the study, which (fortunately) felt good" "Because in the dozens of extra hours I put into my preparation for decentralized selection I am much more motivated. You place in extra `effort' so that you can have the ability to study this, thus you should go for it even more!"Wouters et al. BMC Medical Education (2016) 16:Page 7 ofDiscussion The main objective of this study was to examine the association involving choice and motivation. The results indicate that selected students are more motivated, but don't show different types of motivation in comparison to non-selected students. Moreover, the results seem to help the hypothesis that choice stimulates students' motivation, but also indicate that this may well final only for a brief period of time. Chosen students reported higher strength of motivation than non-selected students, that is in line with findings from other research [2, 25]. A reason for this finding in our institute could possibly be the demanding nature of the choice procedure for which time investment in healthcare activities is actually a criterion. This may possibly lead to one of the most motivated students applying and succeeding in selection, as has previously been suggested by other researchers [20]. Study on variations in style of motivation between selected and nonselected students is scarce. Kusurkar et al. identified greater autonomous motivation in selected students [8]. The sample size of selected students inside the Kusurkar et al. study was pretty smaller. We could not replicate this discovering in a larger sample. Moreover, this study gives a first indication of a good, although possibly title= fpsyg.2017.00007 only temporary, effect of selection on motivation. Such an effect has been hypothesized prior to [1?], but to our knowledge, this can be the first study which attempts to address this situation. Students who have been lately selected reported greater strength and autonomous and controlled kinds of motivation, which suggests that the presence of a selection procedure may possibly enhance the quantity and high quality of students' motivation for medical school.Gher for the "recently selected" group in comparison title= fnhum.2013.00686 together with the "non-(not too long ago) selected" group.
