Metabolic Enzyme Complex

rtz LH, Sargent D, et al. New response evaluation criteria in strong tumours: revised RECIST guideline. European journal of cancer 45: 228247. 33. Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Kallioniemi A, Barlund M, Schraml P, et al. Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor Rate Limiting Enzyme Metabolic Pathways specimens. Nat Med four: 844847. 34. Engelsen IB, Stefansson IM, Akslen LA, Salvesen HB GATA3 expression in estrogen receptor alpha-negative endometrial carcinomas identifies aggressive tumors with high proliferation and poor patient survival. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199: 543 e541547. 35. Salvesen HB, Das S, Akslen LA Loss of nuclear p16 protein expression isn't connected with promoter methylation but defines a subgroup of aggressive endometrial carcinomas with poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 6: 153159. 36. Paik D, Cocco E, Bellone S, Casagrande F, Bellone M, et al. Greater sensitivity to patupilone versus paclitaxel chemotherapy in primary uterine serous papillary carcinoma cell lines with high versus low HER-2/neu expression in vitro. Gynecol Oncol 119: 140145. 37. Hiramatsu HP, Kikuchi Y, Seto H, Nagata I In vitro sensitivity of human endometrial cancer cell lines to paclitaxel or irinotecan in mixture with other aniticancer drugs. Anticancer Drugs 11: 573578. 38. Vandenput I, Trovik J, Leunen K, Wik E, Stefansson I, et al. Evolution in endometrial cancer: evidence from an immunohistochemical study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21: 316322. 39. Amant F, Mirza MR, Creutzberg CL Cancer of your corpus uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 119 Suppl 2: S110117. 40. Halle MK, Werner HM, Krakstad C, Birkeland E, Wik E, et al. Stratification determined by high tumour cell content material in fresh frozen tissue promotes choice of aggressive endometrial carcinomas. Histopathology 60: 516519. 41. Galluzzi L, Maiuri MC, Vitale I, Zischka H, Castedo M, et al. Cell death modalities: classification and pathophysiological implications. Cell death and differentiation 14: 12371243. 8 Stathmin Predicts Response in Endometrial Cancer 42. Taatjes DJ, Sobel BE, Budd RC Morphological and cytochemical determination of cell death by apoptosis. Histochemistry and cell biology 129: 3343. 43. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, et al. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies. Journal in the National Cancer Institute 97: 11801184. 44. Xiao H, Verdier-Pinard P, Fernandez-Fuentes N, Burd B, Angeletti R, et al. Insights in to the mechanism of microtubule stabilization by Taxol. Proceedings of your National Academy of Sciences from the United states of America 103: 1016610173. 45. Arslan C, Sari E, Aksoy S, Altundag K Variation in hormone receptor and HER-2 status in between major and metastatic breast cancer: critique of your literature. Professional opinion on therapeutic targets 15: 2130. 46. Khasraw M, Brogi E, Seidman AD The must examine metastatic tissue at the time of progression of breast cancer: is re-biopsy a necessity or perhaps a luxury Present oncology reports 13: 1725. 47. Simmons C, Miller N, Geddie W, Gianfelice D, Oldfield M, et al. Does confirmatory tumor biopsy alter the management of breast cancer sufferers with 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. distant metastases Annals of oncology: official journal on the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO 20: 14991504. Krakstad C, Trovik J, Wik E, Engelsen IB, Werner HM, et al. Loss of GPER identifies new targets for therapy among a subgroup of ERalpha-positive endometrial cancer patients with poor outcome.