Provocative Details About Bortezomib

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Refractory disease was defined as disease unresponsive to all prior immunosuppressive therapies [36]. Amrinone At each assessment disease activity was scored using British Isles Lupus Activity Grade (BILAG) [37] for SLE and Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) [38] for vasculitis. Glomerular filtration rates (GFR) were calculated using the four variable MDRD equation. Adverse events were classified using the EU Clinical Trials Directive (2001/20/EC), according to severity (mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening or death), seriousness (not serious, death, life-threatening, permanently disabling, requiring hospitalization, prolongation of hospitalization, cancer, or congenital anomaly) and relation to study medication (not related, unlikely, possibly, probably or definitely related). Pre-dose MPA measurements were obtained on up to three occasions per patient after a stable dose of study drug had been established. Samples were analysed for total MPA at trial end by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For SLE complete remission required the absence of BILAG grade A, B and C level disease activity and partial remission required the absence of BILAG A and B activity. For vasculitis complete remission was defined as BVAS ��1 and partial remission required ��50% reduction in BVAS compared with entry. Relapse was defined as the appearance of symptoms attributable to PSV or SLE necessitating selleck chemicals llc a change in immunosuppressive therapy or an increase in corticosteroid dose by at least 10 mg/day [36]. Based on results of previous studies [8, 21�C31] the frequency Bortezomib cost of the primary composite outcome of treatment failure or treatment intolerance was estimated at 70% in the control (MMF) group (30% intolerance, and at least 20% remission failure and 20% relapse). With 20 patients per limb this study was powered to detect an absolute risk reduction of 35% in MS patients with a power of 0.8 and a two sided significance level of 0.05. All analyses were performed according to the intention to treat principle. The results are expressed as values and percentages for categorical variables and medians and ranges for continuous variables. The primary outcome and secondary efficacy and tolerability outcomes were assessed using unadjusted Cox proportional hazards model. Continuous variables were analysed by Wilcoxon signed rank test (paired data) or Mann�CWhitney test (unpaired data). Adverse events were expressed as incidence rates. A value of P