S28,31 and the third trimester for two research.27,29 For controls in

All studies presented within this figure are Of India. Demography 2001, 38, 115?32. Chen, S.; Ravallion, M. More relatively-poor folks in primarily based inside the US.S28,31 and also the third trimester for two research.27,29 For controls in this study, of people who moved for the duration of pregnancy, 74 moved after, 21 moved twice, and 5 moved 3 to 5 instances. This underestimates the total % that moved in the course of pregnancy, as this measure omits individuals who moved each for the duration of pregnancy plus the initial 9 months following birth; on the other hand, only a smaller variety of mothers had their last move after birth (0.two ). Supplementary Figure two shows the % of mothers who moved for the duration of pregnancy and by trimester for cases and controls from case-control studies. Mother's age Table two shows residential mobility by age of mother. Research employed diverse specifications for age categories; Table 2 has younger ages towards the prime from the table and older age categories towards the bottom. Overall, the probability of moving declined with mother's age, with minor exceptions. The lowest mobility was observed in the oldest age category for six of your eight studies in Table 2. 1 study discovered equivalent likelihood of moving across age categories (15.5 to 18.six ) except those 20?4 years, exactly where 27.7 moved.33,34 One more discovered unique probabilities of moving across age groups (fpsyg.2015.00360 circumstances and controls from case-control studies. Alcohol use by mother Two research examined mobility in relation to alcohol use through pregnancy. A single identified a 15.1 mobility for ladies who drank alcohol during pregnancy compared with 13.0 for all those who did not.27 The other found greater rates amongst non-drinkers (24.2 ) than those that consumed alcohol through pregnancy (19.five ).29 Smoking by mother Findings for mobility by smoking status in the course of pregnancy differed by study, with three with the 4 studies obtaining that smokers were more likely to move than non-smokers. Mobility rates among smokers had been higher than for non-smokers at (21.1 versus 12.3 )27 and (22 versus 10 ).31 In yet another study, those that smoked through pregnancy were jir.2012.0142 57 (95 self-confidence interval 42?four ) a lot more likely to move than non-smokers, and those who quitNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptJ Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. Author manuscript; offered in PMC 2013 January 11.Bell and BelangerPagesmoking through pregnancy have been 59 (40?1 ) additional probably to move than non-smokers.35 Other analysis discovered greater mobility among non-smokers (31.5 ) than smokers (19.9 ).29 Among non-smokers, these exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) through pregnancy had a mobility price of 21 compared with 23 for all those not exposed to ETS.31 Race/ethnicity of mother Figure 2 shows residential mobility rates throughout pregnancy by race. Studies applied unique categories for race and ethnicity. All studies presented within this figure are primarily based in the US. Whites were far more probably to move than blacks in many studies,29,30,33,34 but significantly less likely to move in other people.26,27 Mobility prices for Hispanics had been slightly larger than for whites. Supplementary Figure three supplies an analogous figure for cases and controls from casecontrol research. Marital status 3 research examined marital and living status, finding lower mobility among married girls. Whereas 11 of mothers who had been ma.