Stunning Details Of Forskolin
Q-gene processing was used for analyzing the relative DNA outputs (Simon 2003). The mussels were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. After fixation, samples were dehydrated in an ethanol series and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections of 6?��m thickness were cut, mounted and stained with M and F type-specific probes. Dipivefrine M and F type-specific probes were designed in the cytochrome b regions (812?bp). Each probe was prepared using a digoxygenin (DIG) RNA labeling kit with T7 RNA polymerase (Roche) and used at a concentration of 1?��g/mL in the hybridization buffer. ISH was performed according to the method described by Obata et?al. (2010) with the following modifications: Proteinase K treatment (10?��g/mL) was carried out for 15?min at 37��C. Hybridization was performed at 60��C overnight. After hybridization, each section was counterstained by Nuclear Fast red (VECTOR) and observed under a Nikon E600 (Nikon) light microscope. Statistical analyses were performed with R ver. 1. 12.1. For comparison of more than two groups, the Kruskal�CWallis analysis was used. If the Kruskal�CWallis result was significant, the Bonferroni/Dunn procedure was used as a post hoc test. Differences were considered significant when P?see more type-specific primer sets. The gradients of the standard curves were ?3.41 for the M type-specific primer set and ?3.43 for the F type-specific primer set. These correlations and gradients showed the validity of each primer set. No primer dimer was detected in melting curve analyses of either primer set. No amplification was detected with heterogeneous primer sets. These results indicated that the M and F type-specific primer sets designed in this study were useful for the reliable quantification by real-time PCR. The amount and expression levels of mtDNA in the foot, gill, labial palp, midgut gland and gonad tissues were measured individually. Amounts of F type mtDNA in the female gonad were significantly higher than in the foot, gill and labial palp (Fig.?1A). There were no significant differences among the four somatic tissues. Conversely, the amount of M type mtDNA was low and constant in both female gonads Selleckchem Forskolin and somatic tissues. In 20/55 female samples the amount of M type mtDNA was too low to be measured correctly. F type mtDNA expression levels were almost identical among all female tissues (Fig.?1B). However, the expression in gill tissue was significantly higher than in the foot. M type mtDNA expression could not be measured correctly in 36/55 female samples. In the remaining samples (19/55), M type expression levels were low, like the amount of M type mtDNA. The amount of F type mtDNA was significantly lower in male gonads than in the foot and midgut gland (Fig.?2A). Among male somatic tissues, the amounts of F type mtDNA were not statistically different.