Uncommon Site Uncovers The Deceitful Works Of The Erlotinib

We run a series of logistic mixed model that includes the eye movement parameters that had a significant effect in the previous analyses (SI, the LF-P, and the NF-P) using the backward elimination procedure and we test whether they are good predictors of choice accuracy (i.e., how often the participants chose the more advantageous option). The initial model (AIC = 497.2) which includes the three predictors shows that LF-P is marginally significant (�� = 0.49, Z = 1.77, p = 0.07), while NF-P (�� = 0.12, Z = 0.80, p = 0.426), and SI (�� = -0.08, Z = -0.44, p = 0.663) are not. We eliminated SI, the least relevant predictor, and we run a model with the variables LF-P and NF-P. The fit of the model improves (AIC = 495.4), LF-P has a marginally significant effect (�� = 0.49, Z = 1.72, p = 0.08), while NF-P does not (�� = 0.14, Z = 0.71, p = 0.48). Finally, we eliminated the variable NF-P and now the model shows another improvement in the goodness-of-fit (AIC = 493.9) and a fully significant effect of LF-P (�� = 0.53, Z = 2.27, p = 0.023). Information Search Ponatinib patterns for High and Low CRT Scores In order to give a general picture of the information search patterns used by participants with different CRT scores we divided them into two groups �C high and low CRT �C and we compared their search patterns. Participants who gave two or three correct answers were classified as ��high CRT�� (17 participants) and those who gave one or zero correct answers as ��low CRT�� (18 participants). As shown in Figure ?Figure66 the average length of fixations on the price areas for high CRT participants is almost 100 ms longer compared to low CRT participants (low CRT = 334 ms; high CRT = 423 ms). Conversely no differences were found on the Discount areas (low CRT = 249 ms; high CRT = 258 ms). These results suggest that high CRT participants are more likely to engage themselves in the calculation of the final prices and that the mental calculation of the final discounted prices was performed while fixating on the price areas, which greatly simplified the maintenance of the initial prices in the working memory. The two groups differ also in the number of vertical saccades (low CRT = 6.05; high CRT = 7.5) but not in the number of horizontal saccades (low CRT = 3.55; high CRT = 3.35), which is in accordance with the fact that only saccades between price and discount values are useful for the mental calculation. FIGURE 6 Information processing; for low (left) and high (right) CRT participants. The numbers within the blue circles indicates the average length (in milliseconds) of fixations for the four AOIs (the radius of the circles is proportional to the average length ... In general, we suggest that high CRT participants are more likely to remain focused on the initial prices, using vertical saccades to read and maintain the discount values in working memory.