= 0.99). With regards to productivity from institutions, the

There was a powerful important and inverse relationship (r = - 0.83, p 0.01) between rank in the institution as well as the total http://about:blank citations for publication for each and every institution. Co-authorship analysis applying VOSviewer showed 3 clusters of authors (Fig. three). Cluster quantity one included 14 authors, three of them had been amongst the major ten productive authors: Parvez, F (116 co-authorships), Ahsan, H (113 co-authorships), and Chen, Y (112 co-authorships). Authors with larger quantity of co-authorships had greater collaboration compared with those with reduced number of co-authorships. Moreover, authors within the very same cluster are these with closer collaboration when compared with authors who exist in other clusters. Cluster quantity two included 12 authors, 1 of them was from the top ten productive authors; Colford Jr, J.M (17 co-authorships). Cluster quantity 3 included 11 authors, 4 of them have been in the major ten productive list: Wade, T.J (47 co-authorships), Calderon, R.I (34 co-authorships), Craun, G.F (36 coauthorships), and Beach M.J (36 co-authorships). The prime cited articles are shown in Table six [6, 7, 9, 217]. The best cited post was about arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh and received a total of 919 citations. The short article was published in the Bulletin of theTable 1 Poisson loglinear regression for worldwide study productivity on water connected diseases applying the keyword "microbiology"Parameter (Intercept) Keyword (microbiology) B 3.086 .058 P .000 .000 Exp (B) 21.881 1.059 95 Wald Self-confidence Interval for Exp(B) Lower 20.073 1.056 Upper 23.853 1.Dependent variable: worldwide productivity. Predictor variable: quantity of articles with keyword "microbiology". B: coefficient estimates; Exp(B): Exponentiated values of your coefficientsSweileh et al. On the other hand, no studies have already been carried out to assess the http://sspersonaltrainer.co.uk/members/shadow1port/activity/211442/ overall overall health aspects of unsafe drinking or recreational water. Bibliometric analysis on water in general and water technologies happen to be also carried out devoid of focusing on overall health related issues [314]. Our study showed that there is a increasing interest and analysis activity on this topic manifested as an growing trend inside the number of publications especially within the last decade. Fu.= 0.99). Concerning productivity from institutions, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) ranked initial and second respectively (Table 4). Six from the leading ten productive institutions had been based in the USA, 1 was WHO, whilst the remaining three were primarily based in the UK, Germany and Taiwan. There was a sturdy considerable and inverse partnership (r = - 0.83, p 0.01) between rank on the institution and also the total citations for publication for each institution. Institution which ranked very first had the highest total citation when those in rank number ten had the least total citations. Similar relationship existed amongst rank with the institution and the h-index (r = - 0.913, p 0.01). Relating to major productive authors, no considerable dominance was seen and most authors within the prime ten list had study productivity in between 142 articles (Table 5). Even so, the majority of authors (90 ) within the major ten list had been in the USA though the final one within the list was from Spain.