Відмінності між версіями «.52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) six.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м (.52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) six.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-)
 
(не показана одна проміжна версія ще одного учасника)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
(Continued) Low VARIABLES Ladies Each High expenses inside the household Guys Girls Both Day-to-day costs inside the household Males Girls Each Continual Observations Self-assurance interval in parentheses *** p[https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000128 abn0000128] 0.04 (-1.29?.36) 6.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.three (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, have been determinants in the practices scores. Gender decision making didn't show a [http://campuscrimes.tv/members/cocoa8silica/activity/842324/ .52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) six.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-] correlation either.DiscussionTo our understanding, this is the initial time that MCA has been applied to analyze knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning dengue to generate an ordinal score from a data set with various categorical variables. The influence of years of education and history of dengue among households elevated dengue expertise only amongst low- and medium-level expertise profiles. The impact of additional than one particular person reporting housekeeping in the similar household as their principal occupation had a adverse effect on the middle- and high-level expertise scores. Furthermore, choice producing about loved ones overall health care shared by guys and women improved the score of information at any level. Ultimately, practices scores weren't connected to any in the measured sociodemographic or gender decision-making variables..52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) six.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.ten?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) High 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** [https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010112 bmjopen-2015-010112] (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.2 (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.ten?.10) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Ailments | DOI:ten.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Control in ColombiaTable three.
+
The [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Lurbinectedin.html Lurbinectedin site] impact of years of education and history of dengue amongst households improved dengue know-how only amongst low- and medium-level expertise profiles. The impact of more than one particular particular person reporting housekeeping within the identical household as their principal occupation had a negative effect on the middle- and high-level know-how scores..52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) 6.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.10?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) High 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** [https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010112 bmjopen-2015-010112] (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.2 (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.10?.10) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Ailments | DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Manage in ColombiaTable three. (Continued) Low VARIABLES Females Each Higher expenses within the household Guys Girls Both Each day costs inside the household Men Females Each Continual Observations Self-confidence interval in parentheses *** p[https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000128 abn0000128] 0.04 (-1.29?.36) 6.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.3 (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, had been determinants in the practices scores.

Поточна версія на 19:26, 14 квітня 2018

The Lurbinectedin site impact of years of education and history of dengue amongst households improved dengue know-how only amongst low- and medium-level expertise profiles. The impact of more than one particular particular person reporting housekeeping within the identical household as their principal occupation had a negative effect on the middle- and high-level know-how scores..52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) 6.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.10?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) High 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** bmjopen-2015-010112 (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.2 (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.10?.10) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Ailments | DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Manage in ColombiaTable three. (Continued) Low VARIABLES Females Each Higher expenses within the household Guys Girls Both Each day costs inside the household Men Females Each Continual Observations Self-confidence interval in parentheses *** pabn0000128 0.04 (-1.29?.36) 6.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.3 (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, had been determinants in the practices scores.

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=.52**_(-1.02%3F0.01)_-0.51*_(-1.03%3F.02)_six.8th_quantile_0.14***_(0.06%3F.22)_0.06***_(0.03%3F.09)_0.07_(-0.13%3F.28)_0.34**_(0.02%3F.67)_0.47***_(0.24%3F.69)_0.17_(-0.14%3F.47)_0.47***_(0.14%3F.80)_0.66**_(0.14%3F.17)_0.55**_(0.09%3F.01)_-0.03_(-0.14%3F.08)_-0.05_(-&oldid=310512