.52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) six.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-
.52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) 6.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.10?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) High 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** bmjopen-2015-010112 (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.two (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.ten?.ten) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Ailments | DOI:10.1371/Lurbinectedin cost journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Handle in Lurbinectedin price ColombiaTable three. (Continued) Low VARIABLES Females Both Higher costs inside the household Guys Girls Each Every day costs within the household Men Girls Each Constant Observations Self-assurance interval in parentheses *** pabn0000128 0.04 (-1.29?.36) six.8th quantile (-4.69?.66) -1.95 (-4.53?.62) -1.99 (-4.56?.58) Medium 50th quantile (-1.78?.25) -0.35 (-1.81?.11) -0.3 (-1.79?.19) High 87.24th quantile (-0.85?.75) 0.36 (-0.90?.62) 0.48 (-0.80?.76)strata, have been determinants of the practices scores. Gender selection creating did not show a correlation either.DiscussionTo our information, this really is the initial time that MCA has been applied to analyze expertise, attitudes, and practices with regards to dengue to create an ordinal score from a information set with a number of categorical variables..52** (-1.02?0.01) -0.51* (-1.03?.02) 6.8th quantile 0.14*** (0.06?.22) 0.06*** (0.03?.09) 0.07 (-0.13?.28) 0.34** (0.02?.67) 0.47*** (0.24?.69) 0.17 (-0.14?.47) 0.47*** (0.14?.80) 0.66** (0.14?.17) 0.55** (0.09?.01) -0.03 (-0.14?.08) -0.05 (-0.13?.04) 0.17* (-0.01?.34) -0.08 (-0.19?.04) -0.02 (-0.09?.06) 0.21*** (0.12?.31) Medium 50th quantile 0.04** (0.01?.07) 0.03*** (0.02?.04) -0.02 (-0.10?.07) 0.38*** (0.28?.48) 0.39*** (0.28?.49) 0.15** (0.02?.28) 0.14** (0.01?.28) 0.34** (0.03?.64) 0.21** (0.02?.41) -0.07** (-0.13?0.00) -0.02 (-0.06?.02) 0.04 (-0.05?.13) -0.11*** (-0.15?0.08) 0.02 (-0.02?.06) 0.07** (0.01?.12) Higher 87.24th quantile 0 (-0.03?.03) 0.02*** (0.01?.03) -0.05 (-0.15?.04) 0.51*** bmjopen-2015-010112 (0.40?.62) 0.51*** (0.41?.62) 0.23*** (0.14?.33) 0.28*** (0.11?.45) 0.two (-0.13?.52) 0.24* (-0.04?.52) 0.02 (-0.05?.08) 0.02 (-0.04?.08) 0 (-0.ten?.10) -0.08** (-0.15?0.01) 0.03 (-0.01?.07) 0.02 (-0.03?.07)PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases | DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005016 September 28,9 /KAP Surveys and Dengue Control in ColombiaTable 3.
