. PANAS: No impact four. STAI-state: No effect Active vs. sham tDCS: 1. Valence

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

PANAS: No Accompany a vestibular disorder, benefits in socio-professional consequences (quit functioning), psychological effect four. Reduce engagement score for angry faces related to elevated activation within the L OFC, R DLPFC, dorsal/pregenual ACC, R SPG two. Mood VAS: No impact Active R DLPFC vs. sham rTMS: 1. NAP job: Decreased scores for unfavorable faces two. Mood VAS: No impact (Continued)Leyman et al.,Crossover Sham controlled18 (0)21.R DLPFC10 Hz 40 trains of three.9 s 26.1 s ITI 1560 pulses 110 MT1. NAP job with satisfied, sad and neutral faces (t0, t1) two. Mood 5-item VAS: sadness, tension, vigor, fatigue, anger (t0, t1, t40)Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | Volume 9 | title= fpsyg.2017.00007 ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued References Study design N (Males) Imply age in years 24 Internet site of stimulation* L DLPFC (MNI BN) NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) 1. NAP job with delighted, sad and neutral faces (t0, t1) 2. Mood 5-item VAS: sadness, tension, vigor, fatigue, anger (t0, t1, t40) 1. Emotional Stroop task with masked and unmasked neutral and fearful faces (t30) Main resultsCrossover Sham controlled22 (0)10 Hz 40 trains of three.9 s 26.1 s ITI 1560 pulses 110 MT 1 Hz 1 single train 1200 pulses 130 MT 0.six Hz 1 single train 540 pulses 130 MTActive L DLPFC vs. sham rTMS: 1. NAP process: No impact two. Mood VAS: No effectVan Honk et al., 2002bCrossover Sham controlled8 (four)Range: 20?R DLPFC (10/20 EEG)Active vs. sham rTMS: 1. Emotional Stroop task: Decreased attention for unmasked fearful faces Active rTMS, R vs.. PANAS: No effect 4. STAI-state: No effect Active vs. sham tDCS: 1. Valence rating activity: No effectPe -G ez et al.,Crossover Sham controlled16 (0)22.L DLPFC/M2 (10/20 EEG)1 mA 20 min 35 cm1. Valence rating activity with IAPS stimuli (t0.5) 2. Mood 5-item VAS: annoyance, contentment, hope, nervousness, sadness three. PANAS four. STAI-state (t0, t1)Crossover Sham controlled9 (0)25.M2/L DLPFC (10/20 EEG)1 mA 20 min 35 cm1. Valence rating activity with IAPS stimuli (t0.five)(C) EFFECTS OF NIBS ON ATTENTIONAL PROCESSING OF EMOTIONAL Info rTMS research Vanderhasselt et al., 2011 Crossover Sham controlled 28 (0) 22.three R DLPFC (MNI BN) ten Hz 40 trains of three.9 s 26.1 s ITI 1560 pulses 110 MT 10 Hz 40 trains of 3.9 s 26.1 s ITI 1560 pulses 110 MT 1. Exogenous cueing process with neutral and angry faces (t0, t1) two. POMS-32 (t0, t1, t30) Active vs. sham rTMS: 1. Exogenous cueing job: Enhanced AB for angry faces two. POMS-32: No effectDe Raedt et al.,Crossover (n = 18) and parallel (n = 19) sham controlled37 (0)22.L DLPFC R DLPFC (MNI BN)1. Exogenous cueing task with neutral and angry faces through an fMRI scanning (t0, t30) two. Mood 5-item VAS: sadness, tension, vigor, fatigue, anger (t0, t1, t40)Active R DLPFC vs. sham rTMS: 1. Exogenous cueing activity and fMRI: Bigger disengagement score for angry faces connected with decreased activation in R DLPFC, dorsal ACC, and L SPG two. Mood VAS: No effect Active L DLPFC vs.