Відмінності між версіями «Alaysian medical schools, were included in a one-page paper form. The»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
(Створена сторінка: A series of questions [http://campuscrimes.tv/members/screw2cannon/activity/635700/ Ults will be {even more|much more] examined self-perceived support from fami...)
 
м
 
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
A series of questions [http://campuscrimes.tv/members/screw2cannon/activity/635700/ Ults will be {even more|much more] examined self-perceived support from family (encouragement, financial support, etc.) in pursuing the study of medicine, self-perceived decision to study [http://www.lanhecx.com/comment/html/?437094.html K.G. These responses were recorded on a five-point Likert scale from very satisfied to very unsatisfied. These variables were chosen for their possible effect on academic performance in medical schools [36]. The questionnaires were pilot tested with 12, year four medical students for clarity and acceptability and minor modifications were made to increase clarity.The settingThe first- and final-year medical students were contacted in the second semester. The timing was such so that EI assessment was close to the final examination. A briefing on the study was held in their respective classes, and the information sheet and consent form wereData were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19. Independent variables were the demographic parameters and the total MSCEIT scores while the dependent variables were the student's assessment marks and grades. Some of the demographic variables were dichotomised and coded as a "1" as follows: female, high income (> RM 10 000), have a doctor in the family, good family support (very good and good ratings), self-intention to study medicine (disagree and very disagree ratings), socialize well in the campus (very agree and agree ratings), enjoy studying medicine (very agree and agree ratings), feeling anxious (disagree and very disagree ratings), religiosity (very agree and agree ratings), satisfaction with teaching facility and teacher quality, both were (very satisfied and satisfied ratings). These cut-offs were used mainly to allow adequate sample sizes for analyses and yet remain meaningful in terms of their impact on promotion or granting of the degree.Alaysian medical schools, were included in a one-page paper form. The items were: age, gender (male or female), ethnicity of student based on their paternal side (Malay, Chinese, Indian, Aborigine or other), total income of all family members of parents and siblings in Ringgit Malaysia (20 000), and having a medical doctor in the family (first and second degree relatives, from grandparents to children of the siblings). A series of questions examined self-perceived support from family (encouragement, financial support, etc.) in pursuing the study of medicine, self-perceived decision to study medicine based on family or personal choice, extent of social life while on campus (including hostels, hospitals etc.), enjoyment in studying medicine, anxiety (feelings of distress and overwhelmed) and religiosity (in adhering to one's religion's requirement and ways of life). These questions employed a five point Likert scale (very satisfied to very unsatisfied). The last two items were about perceptions of the teaching facility (availability and experiences in utilising teaching and learning facilities in the residing campus and/or hospital) and teacher quality (teacher's ability to deliver course materials). These responses were recorded on a five-point Likert scale from very satisfied to very unsatisfied. These variables were chosen for their possible effect on academic performance in medical schools [36]. The questionnaires were pilot tested with 12, year four medical students for clarity and acceptability and minor modifications were made to increase clarity.The settingThe first- and final-year medical students were contacted in the second semester. The timing was such so that EI assessment was close to the final examination.]
+
Alaysian medical schools, were included in a one-page paper form. The items were: age, gender (male or female), ethnicity of student based on their paternal side (Malay, Chinese, Indian, Aborigine or other), total income of all family members of parents and siblings in Ringgit Malaysia (20 000), and having a medical doctor in the family (first and second degree relatives, from grandparents to children of the siblings). A series of questions examined self-perceived support from family (encouragement, financial support, etc.) in pursuing the study of medicine, self-perceived decision to study medicine based on family or personal choice, extent of social life while on campus (including hostels, hospitals etc.), enjoyment in studying medicine, anxiety (feelings of distress and overwhelmed) and [http://about:blank The three BMI effects were {significant|substantial] religiosity (in adhering to one's religion's requirement and ways of life). These questions employed a five point Likert scale (very satisfied to very unsatisfied). The last two items were about perceptions of the teaching facility (availability and experiences in utilising teaching and learning facilities in the residing campus and/or hospital) and teacher quality (teacher's ability to deliver course materials). These responses were recorded on a five-point Likert scale from very satisfied to very unsatisfied. These variables were chosen for their possible effect on academic performance in medical schools [36]. The questionnaires were pilot tested with 12, year four medical students for clarity and acceptability and minor modifications were made to increase clarity.The settingThe first- and final-year medical students were contacted in the second semester. The timing was such so that EI assessment was close to the final examination. A briefing on the study was held in their respective classes, and the information sheet and consent form wereData were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19. Independent variables were the [http://www.jyzyf.com/comment/html/?7459.html Rvival of regular cells. Even so, the effects of your mechanical properties] demographic parameters and the total MSCEIT scores while the dependent variables were the student's assessment marks and grades. Some of the demographic variables were dichotomised and coded as a "1" as follows: female, high income (> RM 10 000), have a doctor in the family, good family support (very good and good ratings), self-intention to study medicine (disagree and very disagree ratings), socialize well in the campus (very agree and agree ratings), enjoy studying medicine (very agree and agree ratings), feeling anxious (disagree and very disagree ratings), religiosity (very agree and agree ratings), satisfaction with teaching facility and teacher quality, both were (very satisfied and satisfied ratings). Good and poor overall academic performances were defined as examination marks  70  and

Поточна версія на 00:13, 28 березня 2018

Alaysian medical schools, were included in a one-page paper form. The items were: age, gender (male or female), ethnicity of student based on their paternal side (Malay, Chinese, Indian, Aborigine or other), total income of all family members of parents and siblings in Ringgit Malaysia (20 000), and having a medical doctor in the family (first and second degree relatives, from grandparents to children of the siblings). A series of questions examined self-perceived support from family (encouragement, financial support, etc.) in pursuing the study of medicine, self-perceived decision to study medicine based on family or personal choice, extent of social life while on campus (including hostels, hospitals etc.), enjoyment in studying medicine, anxiety (feelings of distress and overwhelmed) and The three BMI effects were {significant|substantial religiosity (in adhering to one's religion's requirement and ways of life). These questions employed a five point Likert scale (very satisfied to very unsatisfied). The last two items were about perceptions of the teaching facility (availability and experiences in utilising teaching and learning facilities in the residing campus and/or hospital) and teacher quality (teacher's ability to deliver course materials). These responses were recorded on a five-point Likert scale from very satisfied to very unsatisfied. These variables were chosen for their possible effect on academic performance in medical schools [36]. The questionnaires were pilot tested with 12, year four medical students for clarity and acceptability and minor modifications were made to increase clarity.The settingThe first- and final-year medical students were contacted in the second semester. The timing was such so that EI assessment was close to the final examination. A briefing on the study was held in their respective classes, and the information sheet and consent form wereData were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19. Independent variables were the Rvival of regular cells. Even so, the effects of your mechanical properties demographic parameters and the total MSCEIT scores while the dependent variables were the student's assessment marks and grades. Some of the demographic variables were dichotomised and coded as a "1" as follows: female, high income (> RM 10 000), have a doctor in the family, good family support (very good and good ratings), self-intention to study medicine (disagree and very disagree ratings), socialize well in the campus (very agree and agree ratings), enjoy studying medicine (very agree and agree ratings), feeling anxious (disagree and very disagree ratings), religiosity (very agree and agree ratings), satisfaction with teaching facility and teacher quality, both were (very satisfied and satisfied ratings). Good and poor overall academic performances were defined as examination marks 70 and