Відмінності між версіями «And ML.Approaches Literature SearchWe carried out a literature search to»
м |
м |
||
| Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
| − | + | We reached out to authors and relevant key stakeholders to identify unpublished research and connected more data from manuscripts. No language restrictions have been applied.Study and Facts SelectionThe titles, abstracts, and studies identified in the literature search were assessed by two reviewers. We incorporated randomized clinical trials (RCT) which assessed the effects of interventions for treating CL and ML. Subjects getting CL and/or ML or VL by clinical presentation and confirmed by histopathology, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) evaluation or culture of lesions had been included. We thought of any intervention compared with no intervention, placebo, or other remedy regimens. Studies in which the intervention group incorporated vaccines were excluded. All studies matching the inclusion criteria had been reviewed by the authors and disagreement on inclusion was settled by way of discussion.Interventions for Leishmaniasis: A ReviewData Extraction and OutcomesAt least two reviewers (ANM-E and LR) independently extracted the relevant data applying a predesigned information extraction form; disagreements among reviewers had been resolved by referring to a third author. Taking into account that a Cochrane review assessed and extracted information from previously published trials, we focused our assessment on updating provided proof. Hence, we developed a information collection form to systemically extract data from RCTs published later than prior the Cochrane evaluation. The authors examined retrieved papers, identified, and recorded the key characteristics on the study such as: qualitative aspects (for example date of publication, study design and style, geographical location and setting, population description, choice criteria, patient samplings, and funding source), traits of participants (age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status), species of causative Leishmania, interventions (i.e. type, duration, process utilised to measure) and outcomes (sort of outcome, outcome assessment technique, sort of statistical evaluation, adjustment variables) plus the [http://www.jxjfqg.com/comment/html/?154651.html Uld be detected with our routine (Fig. 1 B and Fig. S] danger of bias.And ML.Techniques Literature SearchWe carried out a literature search to determine research assessing the effects of therapeutic interventions for American CL and ML. Searched were planned to update findings in the Cochrane systematic overview published in 2009 [29]. Structured searches had been conducted in PubMed (January 2009 to July 2012), the Cochrane Library (quantity 6, 2012), and LILACS (January 2009 to July 2012) using a complete list of crucial terms that have been adapted to every database (Supporting Information and facts S1. Search techniques). We searched the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search portal of WHO (ICTRP) to recognize past and ongoing trials working with the important word ``leishma*. The references of both integrated and excluded material have been examined in effort to seek out additional relevant papers. We also completed a search in Scirus (limits: medicine, report title; July, 2012) to recognize research published in other databases. We reached out to authors and relevant essential stakeholders to identify unpublished research and connected added information from manuscripts. No language restrictions had been applied.Study and Info SelectionThe titles, abstracts, and research identified inside the literature search had been assessed by two reviewers. We integrated randomized clinical trials (RCT) which assessed the effects of interventions for treating CL and ML. Subjects having CL and/or ML or VL by clinical presentation and confirmed by histopathology, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis or culture of lesions have been integrated. We regarded any intervention compared with no intervention, placebo, or other therapy regimens. Studies in which the intervention group integrated vaccines were excluded. | |
Поточна версія на 11:26, 15 березня 2018
We reached out to authors and relevant key stakeholders to identify unpublished research and connected more data from manuscripts. No language restrictions have been applied.Study and Facts SelectionThe titles, abstracts, and studies identified in the literature search were assessed by two reviewers. We incorporated randomized clinical trials (RCT) which assessed the effects of interventions for treating CL and ML. Subjects getting CL and/or ML or VL by clinical presentation and confirmed by histopathology, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) evaluation or culture of lesions had been included. We thought of any intervention compared with no intervention, placebo, or other remedy regimens. Studies in which the intervention group incorporated vaccines were excluded. All studies matching the inclusion criteria had been reviewed by the authors and disagreement on inclusion was settled by way of discussion.Interventions for Leishmaniasis: A ReviewData Extraction and OutcomesAt least two reviewers (ANM-E and LR) independently extracted the relevant data applying a predesigned information extraction form; disagreements among reviewers had been resolved by referring to a third author. Taking into account that a Cochrane review assessed and extracted information from previously published trials, we focused our assessment on updating provided proof. Hence, we developed a information collection form to systemically extract data from RCTs published later than prior the Cochrane evaluation. The authors examined retrieved papers, identified, and recorded the key characteristics on the study such as: qualitative aspects (for example date of publication, study design and style, geographical location and setting, population description, choice criteria, patient samplings, and funding source), traits of participants (age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status), species of causative Leishmania, interventions (i.e. type, duration, process utilised to measure) and outcomes (sort of outcome, outcome assessment technique, sort of statistical evaluation, adjustment variables) plus the Uld be detected with our routine (Fig. 1 B and Fig. S danger of bias.And ML.Techniques Literature SearchWe carried out a literature search to determine research assessing the effects of therapeutic interventions for American CL and ML. Searched were planned to update findings in the Cochrane systematic overview published in 2009 [29]. Structured searches had been conducted in PubMed (January 2009 to July 2012), the Cochrane Library (quantity 6, 2012), and LILACS (January 2009 to July 2012) using a complete list of crucial terms that have been adapted to every database (Supporting Information and facts S1. Search techniques). We searched the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform search portal of WHO (ICTRP) to recognize past and ongoing trials working with the important word ``leishma*. The references of both integrated and excluded material have been examined in effort to seek out additional relevant papers. We also completed a search in Scirus (limits: medicine, report title; July, 2012) to recognize research published in other databases. We reached out to authors and relevant essential stakeholders to identify unpublished research and connected added information from manuscripts. No language restrictions had been applied.Study and Info SelectionThe titles, abstracts, and research identified inside the literature search had been assessed by two reviewers. We integrated randomized clinical trials (RCT) which assessed the effects of interventions for treating CL and ML. Subjects having CL and/or ML or VL by clinical presentation and confirmed by histopathology, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis or culture of lesions have been integrated. We regarded any intervention compared with no intervention, placebo, or other therapy regimens. Studies in which the intervention group integrated vaccines were excluded.
