Anges from five to 30?0 in sufferers below various conditions, such as coronary

Citation analysis is actually a bibliometric process that determines the influence of an article Gedatolisib inside the scientific community and evaluates the influence aspect (IF) of a journal.7 The amount of citations received by an write-up is a measure of its recognition and influence within the scientific neighborhood. Assessing the articles and journals Applying the modified method on the approaches by Lim et al17 and Azer and Azer,18 two reviewers (Y-hL and S-qW) reviewed the Win 63843 cost leading one hundred cited (T100) articles plus the following data have been compiled: (1) citation quantity, (2) number of authors and authorship (initially, second and corresponding authors), (3) title, (four) publication year and (five) country of o.Anges from 5 to 30?0 in patients under various conditions, for example coronary intervention,2 cardiac surgery3 and intensive care unit admission.4 The development of AKI increases hospital stay and healthcare expenses, and results in poor short-term and long-term outcomes.four Considering the value of AKI, researches within this field has been growing, and numerous articles happen to be published annually, giving new insights into the mechanism, early recognition and prevention or therapy of AKI.five 6 Nevertheless, little is known relating to the excellent of scientific achievements within this region. Citation evaluation can be a bibliometric course of action that determines the influence of an post within the scientific community and evaluates the impact factor (IF) of a journal.7 The amount of citations received by an write-up is usually a measure of its recognition and influence inside the scientific neighborhood. A paper with higher citation history may well be title= 2013/480630 more useful in its field.8 9 Additionally, citation evaluation of the scientific literature could help to determine articles, investigation subjects andLiu Y-hui, et al. BMJ Open 2016;six:e011630. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-Open Access authors of influence.10 Therefore, academic institutions, funding agencies along with the public turn into increasingly enthusiastic about employing citation evaluation to assess the study high quality and productivity of individual researchers.7 Various attempts happen to be made to determine essentially the most cited articles in a variety of healthcare disciplines, like psychology,11 radiology,12 hypospadiology,13 hypertension,14 surgery15 and cardiac surgery.16 Nonetheless, no citation analysis of AKI has been title= s12687-015-0238-0 published to date. Thus, we aimed to analyse the qualities in the one hundred top-cited articles focused on AKI, and to establish achievements and advances in this field through the previous century. Approaches Search approach We performed a citation search of the Science Citation Index Expanded database on the Thomson Reuters Web of Science Core Collection (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA) from 1945 to 15 July 2015. The following search important words had been utilized: `acute kidney injury' or `AKI' or `acute renal failure' or `ARF'. All electronic searches had been conducted on a single day, 15 July 2015, to avoid alterations in citation price as considerably as you possibly can. Immediately after all identified articles have been retrieved, and the final results were sorted utilizing the option `Times cited', which yielded a list of all of the articles published inside a distinct journal ranked by citation number. The papers that had a higher citation density were ranked greater. Study selection Articles around the list were then reviewed by two independent reviewers (Y-hL and S-qW) by reading the abstracts acquired from Internet of Science. When it was necessary, the full texts were acquired from PubMed, EMBASE or ScienceDirect. Only studies focusing on AKI because the most important subject and inside the English language have been integrated. The exclusion title= nature12715 criteria had been: (1) articles in languages aside from English, (2) articles focused on other topics apart from about AKI. Any disagreement amongst the two reviewers was resolved by way of discussion using a third reviewer ( J-hX).