Відмінності між версіями «Atients with visual impairment had a higher prevalence of DM and»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
Age, cardiovascular disease, and health insurance were also significant clinical factors affecting visual impairment (OR 1.215; 95  CI 1.099?.344, P [http://hsepeoplejobs.com/members/stringhelp6/activity/379498/ Security and Health Statistics, 1987; Drudi] groups (Table 3, P ?0.708). Figure 1 depicts the Kaplan eier curve for all-cause mortality as visual impairment. As shown, all-cause mortality was significantly increased in patients with visual impairment compared with in patients without visual impairment (P
+
Sex, BMI, smoking, duration of dialysis, left ventricular hypertrophy on electrocardiogram, hemoglobin, corrected calcium, phosphorus, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, hs-CRP levels, and HD adequacy were not [http://www.medchemexpress.com/ZL006.html get ZL006] significantly different between patients without visual impairment and those with visual impairment. There was no difference in the use of b-blocker at the time of enrollment between the 2 groups. In the multivariable logistic analysis, the comorbid condition of DM was the most significant risk factor for visual impairment (odds ratio [OR] 2.777, 95  confidence interval [CI] 2.170?.553, P

Версія за 12:02, 28 березня 2018

Sex, BMI, smoking, duration of dialysis, left ventricular hypertrophy on electrocardiogram, hemoglobin, corrected calcium, phosphorus, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, hs-CRP levels, and HD adequacy were not get ZL006 significantly different between patients without visual impairment and those with visual impairment. There was no difference in the use of b-blocker at the time of enrollment between the 2 groups. In the multivariable logistic analysis, the comorbid condition of DM was the most significant risk factor for visual impairment (odds ratio [OR] 2.777, 95 confidence interval [CI] 2.170?.553, P