Відмінності між версіями «Bvi Company Formation Hong Kong»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
(Створена сторінка: Maybe you should add the Channel Islands to your list when you look for cheap places to retire.(7.) Isle of Man: The Isle of Man is considered somewhat of a fin...)
 
м (Bvi Company Formation Hong Kong)
 
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
Maybe you should add the Channel Islands to your list when you look for cheap places to retire.(7.) Isle of Man: The Isle of Man is considered somewhat of a financial center for low taxes. This tiny island, located between England and Ireland has a very low income tax, of maximum 20% and no more than 120,000 pounds.Pros: Low tax rates are not the only advantages offered by this small island. Their pension plan is also really great, which is way many companies choose to have their employee pension plans held in accounts in this country. It's possible to benefit from these pension plans starting from the age of 50 and onwards.Cons: Establishing companies in the Isle of Man may be costly, especially for non - commercial activities and the registration process can be quite complex.(8.) Ireland: Ireland is often referred to as a tax haven, despite Irish officials asserting that is not the case. However, a Congressional Research Service report found that American multinational companies collectively reported 43 percent of their foreign earnings in five small tax haven countries: Bermuda, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Ireland.(9.) Mauritius:Located in the Indian Ocean, near Madagascar, Mauritius is another island that attracts many foreign investments. A large number of international corporations have subsidiaries established in Mauritius.Pros: The corporate tax levied in Mauritius is really low, compared with other jurisdictions, of only 15%. Capital gains and interest are not taxed in Mauritius and residents can also benefit from various tax exemptions, due to double tax treaties.Cons: Mauritius was used as a location for investments, especially for those directed towards India, but in May 2016, a new protocol amending the double taxation treaty between India and Mauritius was signed. This gives India a source based right to tax capital gains, which arise from alienation of [https://hkinco.com hong kong company set up] shares of Indian resident companies acquired by Mauritius residents.(10.) Monaco:This tiny state has only 36,000 residents, but it attracts many entrepreneurs and companies willing to invest in this small country. Why? Because the income tax for residents hasn't changed since 1869.Pros: Once a person has become a Monaco resident, they are allowed to keep all the income they make, without any limitations. It's no wonder that most of the world's millionaires are residents of Monaco. Corporate taxes are also really low, which makes Monaco a great location to start a company.Cons: In order to become a Monaco resident, a person needs to be a citizen of an EU - member state or have a long-term French visa. It's also necessary to deposit at least 100,000 Euro in a bank in Monaco, to have private health insurance and to buy a property in Monaco.(11.) Switzerland:Switzerland has in its banks right now the equivalent of 6.5 trillion dollars of assets under management, and 51% of that comes from abroad, so it's not really a surprise the country is also a global leader in asset management, with a market share of 28%.Under international pressure, Switzerland has relaxed slightly in recent years its laws on fiscal secrecy, but the lobby for keeping these regulations remains strong as evidenced by the aggressive policy of the country against pressures for disclosure of information in this sector.Pros: Combining low taxes with a top - notch banking system, it's no wonder that Switzerland is one of the most popular tax havens in Europe.
+
Malta
 +
 
 +
Estonia
 +
 
 +
Latvia
 +
 
 +
Cyprus
 +
 
 +
Switzerland
 +
 
 +
Lichtenstein
 +
 
 +
Netherlands
 +
 
 +
Luxembourg
 +
 
 +
Gibraltar
 +
There are lots more but I can't think of any reason you'd want to use any of the others when you've got those to choose from and frankly there are definite preferences among those depending on what you're doing. We'll cover each in detail in coming posts but for today we're going to focus on Gibraltar. As it stands today as of this writing we LOVE Gibraltar. But when I first started studying offshore jurisdictions I didn't quite understand why I would love it in spite of it being mentioned to me by several people.On the surface Gibraltar isn't that spectacular:
 +
 
 +
While supposedly inexpensive by European standards Gibraltar company formation or incorporation typically costs around 850 GBP in the retail market not counting other required documents
 +
 
 +
There's a 10% tax rate and no tax treaties
 +
 
 +
Company formation takes a minimum 2 weeks often dragging on much longer
 +
 
 +
Director/ownership details are public
 +
 
 +
There's no domestic corporate banking to speak of
 +
 
 +
Over a certain level audited financials are required
 +
Reading the list it doesn't sound that compelling to me and unless there are special circumstances I'd say if you're going to form a resident Gibraltar company you're probably better off looking elsewhere (alternatives discussed in other posts). It used to be that Gibraltar being an EU member but not a member of the VAT regime was helpful but updates to the VAT regime have mostly eliminated these benefits.Favorable Tax TreatmentHowever, Gibraltar is one of only 3, really only 2, jurisdictions within the EEA (European Economic Area) with a particular nuance in their corporate residency laws. Tax residency in Gibraltar is based ONLY on management and control, which means you can have a non-resident Gibraltar company. What does that mean?A non-resident company isn't liable for any local income taxes except on domestic source income (no income in Gibraltar = 0% corporate tax rate). So we've just gone from Gibraltar being a 10% tax jurisdiction, which is OK, but not exceptional, to a fantastic 0% tax regime.
 +
 
 +
Non-resident Gibraltar companies also benefit from not having the same requirements when it comes to the likes of audited financial statements that resident companies have.Non-Residency RequirementsBy default a Gibraltar company is not non-resident so to ensure it is you need to file according with the local financial authority and meet the appropriate criteria. These include:
 +
 
 +
No funds remitted to Gibraltar
 +
 
 +
No business in Gibraltar or from Gibraltar sources (not a big deal since it's a tiny market of around 80 000 people)
 +
 
 +
Management and control (generally speaking directorship of the company) outside of Gibraltar
 +
This does raise some questions such as:
 +
 
 +
If no funds can be remitted to Gibraltar (there's a sort of remittance basis in their tax system) where should the company bank?
 +
 
 +
If management and control isn't in Gibraltar where should it be?
 +
Banking & ReputationCorporate banking in Gibraltar is virtually non-existent anyway, while Gibraltar is fairly well known for some of their banking it is private banking not corporate banking and certainly not for small businesses. The good news is this means other jurisdictions, particularly other European jurisdictions are fairly familiar with Gibraltar companies banking abroad and relative to a lot of other offshore jurisdictions gaining banking for a Gibraltar company can be relatively easy.Unfortunately, even though this is the case the available jurisdictions that accept non-resident companies with strong banking are few and diminishing so it's becoming more and more attractive to be able to bank locally in spite of an asset protection argument against doing so but that's for another post.

Поточна версія на 14:55, 20 березня 2018

Malta

Estonia

Latvia

Cyprus

Switzerland

Lichtenstein

Netherlands

Luxembourg

Gibraltar There are lots more but I can't think of any reason you'd want to use any of the others when you've got those to choose from and frankly there are definite preferences among those depending on what you're doing. We'll cover each in detail in coming posts but for today we're going to focus on Gibraltar. As it stands today as of this writing we LOVE Gibraltar. But when I first started studying offshore jurisdictions I didn't quite understand why I would love it in spite of it being mentioned to me by several people.On the surface Gibraltar isn't that spectacular:

While supposedly inexpensive by European standards Gibraltar company formation or incorporation typically costs around 850 GBP in the retail market not counting other required documents

There's a 10% tax rate and no tax treaties

Company formation takes a minimum 2 weeks often dragging on much longer

Director/ownership details are public

There's no domestic corporate banking to speak of

Over a certain level audited financials are required Reading the list it doesn't sound that compelling to me and unless there are special circumstances I'd say if you're going to form a resident Gibraltar company you're probably better off looking elsewhere (alternatives discussed in other posts). It used to be that Gibraltar being an EU member but not a member of the VAT regime was helpful but updates to the VAT regime have mostly eliminated these benefits.Favorable Tax TreatmentHowever, Gibraltar is one of only 3, really only 2, jurisdictions within the EEA (European Economic Area) with a particular nuance in their corporate residency laws. Tax residency in Gibraltar is based ONLY on management and control, which means you can have a non-resident Gibraltar company. What does that mean?A non-resident company isn't liable for any local income taxes except on domestic source income (no income in Gibraltar = 0% corporate tax rate). So we've just gone from Gibraltar being a 10% tax jurisdiction, which is OK, but not exceptional, to a fantastic 0% tax regime.

Non-resident Gibraltar companies also benefit from not having the same requirements when it comes to the likes of audited financial statements that resident companies have.Non-Residency RequirementsBy default a Gibraltar company is not non-resident so to ensure it is you need to file according with the local financial authority and meet the appropriate criteria. These include:

No funds remitted to Gibraltar

No business in Gibraltar or from Gibraltar sources (not a big deal since it's a tiny market of around 80 000 people)

Management and control (generally speaking directorship of the company) outside of Gibraltar This does raise some questions such as:

If no funds can be remitted to Gibraltar (there's a sort of remittance basis in their tax system) where should the company bank?

If management and control isn't in Gibraltar where should it be? Banking & ReputationCorporate banking in Gibraltar is virtually non-existent anyway, while Gibraltar is fairly well known for some of their banking it is private banking not corporate banking and certainly not for small businesses. The good news is this means other jurisdictions, particularly other European jurisdictions are fairly familiar with Gibraltar companies banking abroad and relative to a lot of other offshore jurisdictions gaining banking for a Gibraltar company can be relatively easy.Unfortunately, even though this is the case the available jurisdictions that accept non-resident companies with strong banking are few and diminishing so it's becoming more and more attractive to be able to bank locally in spite of an asset protection argument against doing so but that's for another post.