Відмінності між версіями «Currently reviewed after PsycINFO search (n = 126) were investigated. The PubMed search»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
(Створена сторінка: Analysis--A quantitative content evaluation (Krippendorff, 1980; Weber, 1987) was carried out on the 26 definitions of irritability (citations asterisked in ref...)
 
м
 
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
Analysis--A quantitative content evaluation (Krippendorff, 1980; Weber, 1987) was carried out on the 26 definitions of irritability (citations asterisked in reference list1). Definitions were frequently brief. The median was 27 words, ranging from 10 to 83 words [https://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6472 jmir.6472] (M = 32.69; SD = 18.94). Nvivo 9 (QSR International, 2010) was utilised to help code the information into compact meaningful units that ranged from one particular word (e.g., anger) to quick phrases (e.g., a low threshold). Preliminary codes have been created then expanded and contracted to match all of the information within a parsimonious manner. This resulted in eight main content material categories. Study 1: Findings Behaviour--Most of your definitions (20/26) described irritability as a (verbal or nonverbal) behaviour. Commonly (14/20), the behaviour was [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Peficitinib.html order JNJ-54781532] classified as expressed anger or aggressive behaviour. Three of Caprara and colleagues' 4 definitions (Caprara et al., 1986; Caprara, Renzi, D'Imperio,  Travaglia, 1983; Caprara, Barbaranelli, Colombo, Politi,  Valerio, 1995) produced no reference to an aggressive behaviour, but did reference "offensive," "impulsive," "rude," and/or "controversial" behaviour. The remaining three behaviours were "negative," but not otherwise specified. None with the definitions described violent behaviour. Emotion or affect--All but two (24/26) utilized emotion words, especially referred to irritability as an emotion, and/or mentioned irritability was a response to negative emotions. By far, by far the most popular emotion pointed out was anger (17/26). Annoyance was pointed out in five definitions and impatience in three definitions. All other references to a distinct emotion or affect (i.e., intolerance, grouchiness, exasperation, sadness, psychological tension, touchiness, and aggravation) were produced in only one particular or two definitions. Cognition--Cognition was referred to in only three of your 26 definitions. Craig et al. (2008) stated that irritability predisposes one particular to "certain cognitions (e.g., hostile1A table with the definitions used is available in the initial or second authors upon request.Emot Rev. Author manuscript; obtainable in PMC 2016 April 27.Barata et al.PagePMC Canada Author Manuscript PMC Canada Author Manuscript PMC Canada Author Manuscript Studyappraisals)," and DiGiuseppe  Tafrate (2007) stated that irritability happens "without cognitive mediation." The third described "cognitive" symptoms, but did not specify the sorts of cognitions one might expertise. Physiological--Only four definitions produced any reference to physiological experiences (defined very broadly). 3 referred to "tension," and also the fourth utilised the phrase "a physiological emotional response" (Safer, 2009). Qualifiers--Very early in the coding and analysis with the definitions, it became apparent that basically listing the behaviours, feelings, cognitions, and physiological references would not get at the essence of most of the definitions. These irritable experiences were nearly normally (23/26) certified [https://dx.doi.org/10.4137/SART.S23503 SART.S23503] or moderated in some way. Most normally (15/26), the definition integrated a behaviour or emotion that was said to take place with minimum provocation, at a reduced threshold, or effortlessly. An additional common qualifier (5/26) w.Already reviewed immediately after PsycINFO search (n = 126) were investigated. The PubMed search yielded four more definitions. Subsequent a comparable search of Embase for "irritable mood" resulted in 175 hits, 41 articles examined, and one distinctive definition of irritability. A comparable search in CINAHL did not result in any new definitions. Analysis--A quantitative content evaluation (Krippendorff, 1980; Weber, 1987) was conducted around the 26 definitions of irritability (citations asterisked in reference list1).
+
Preliminary codes were developed after which expanded and [http://05961.net/comment/html/?340845.html .Meta-regression of pooled prevalence estimates of HPV sorts by covariatesMeta-regressions had been] contracted to fit all of the information within a parsimonious manner. All other references to a precise emotion or [http://05961.net/comment/html/?345448.html N the study had the possible to discover essential associations among] influence (i.e., intolerance, grouchiness, exasperation, sadness, psychological tension, touchiness, and aggravation) were produced in only one or two definitions. Cognition--Cognition was referred to in only 3 of your 26 definitions. Craig et al. (2008) stated that irritability predisposes 1 to "certain cognitions (e.g., hostile1A table from the definitions made use of is out there in the initially or second authors upon request.Emot Rev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 April 27.Barata et al.PagePMC Canada Author Manuscript PMC Canada Author Manuscript PMC Canada Author Manuscript Studyappraisals)," and DiGiuseppe  Tafrate (2007) stated that irritability occurs "without cognitive mediation." The third described "cognitive" symptoms, but didn't specify the types of cognitions one particular could knowledge. Physiological--Only 4 definitions made any reference to physiological experiences (defined really broadly). 3 referred to "tension," and the fourth employed the phrase "a physiological emotional response" (Safer, 2009). Qualifiers--Very early within the coding and evaluation with the definitions, it became apparent that basically listing the behaviours, feelings, cognitions, and physiological references would not get at the essence of most of the definitions. These irritable experiences have been practically generally (23/26) qualified [https://dx.doi.org/10.4137/SART.S23503 SART.S23503] or moderated in some way. Most typically (15/26), the definition incorporated a behaviour or emotion that was mentioned to take place with minimum provocation, at a decreased threshold, or quickly. An additional typical qualifier (5/26) w.Already reviewed right after PsycINFO search (n = 126) were investigated. The PubMed search yielded four more definitions. Next a related search of Embase for "irritable mood" resulted in 175 hits, 41 articles examined, and one one of a kind definition of irritability. A comparable search in CINAHL didn't result in any new definitions. Analysis--A quantitative content analysis (Krippendorff, 1980; Weber, 1987) was performed on the 26 definitions of irritability (citations asterisked in reference list1). Definitions had been frequently brief. The median was 27 words, ranging from 10 to 83 words [https://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6472 jmir.6472] (M = 32.69; SD = 18.94). Nvivo 9 (QSR International, 2010) was utilized to assist code the information into compact meaningful units that ranged from 1 word (e.g., anger) to brief phrases (e.g., a low threshold). Preliminary codes were developed after which expanded and contracted to match all the data in a parsimonious manner. This resulted in eight main content categories. Study 1: Findings Behaviour--Most of the definitions (20/26) described irritability as a (verbal or nonverbal) behaviour. Ordinarily (14/20), the behaviour was classified as expressed anger or aggressive behaviour. 3 of Caprara and colleagues' four definitions (Caprara et al., 1986; Caprara, Renzi, D'Imperio,  Travaglia, 1983; Caprara, Barbaranelli, Colombo, Politi,  Valerio, 1995) produced no reference to an aggressive behaviour, but did reference "offensive," "impulsive," "rude," and/or "controversial" behaviour. The remaining 3 behaviours have been "negative," but not otherwise specified. None from the definitions described violent behaviour. Emotion or affect--All but two (24/26) used emotion words, specifically referred to irritability as an emotion, and/or mentioned irritability was a response to unfavorable feelings. By far, essentially the most widespread emotion mentioned was anger (17/26). Annoyance was described in five definitions and impatience in three definitions.

Поточна версія на 06:57, 27 лютого 2018

Preliminary codes were developed after which expanded and .Meta-regression of pooled prevalence estimates of HPV sorts by covariatesMeta-regressions had been contracted to fit all of the information within a parsimonious manner. All other references to a precise emotion or N the study had the possible to discover essential associations among influence (i.e., intolerance, grouchiness, exasperation, sadness, psychological tension, touchiness, and aggravation) were produced in only one or two definitions. Cognition--Cognition was referred to in only 3 of your 26 definitions. Craig et al. (2008) stated that irritability predisposes 1 to "certain cognitions (e.g., hostile1A table from the definitions made use of is out there in the initially or second authors upon request.Emot Rev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 April 27.Barata et al.PagePMC Canada Author Manuscript PMC Canada Author Manuscript PMC Canada Author Manuscript Studyappraisals)," and DiGiuseppe Tafrate (2007) stated that irritability occurs "without cognitive mediation." The third described "cognitive" symptoms, but didn't specify the types of cognitions one particular could knowledge. Physiological--Only 4 definitions made any reference to physiological experiences (defined really broadly). 3 referred to "tension," and the fourth employed the phrase "a physiological emotional response" (Safer, 2009). Qualifiers--Very early within the coding and evaluation with the definitions, it became apparent that basically listing the behaviours, feelings, cognitions, and physiological references would not get at the essence of most of the definitions. These irritable experiences have been practically generally (23/26) qualified SART.S23503 or moderated in some way. Most typically (15/26), the definition incorporated a behaviour or emotion that was mentioned to take place with minimum provocation, at a decreased threshold, or quickly. An additional typical qualifier (5/26) w.Already reviewed right after PsycINFO search (n = 126) were investigated. The PubMed search yielded four more definitions. Next a related search of Embase for "irritable mood" resulted in 175 hits, 41 articles examined, and one one of a kind definition of irritability. A comparable search in CINAHL didn't result in any new definitions. Analysis--A quantitative content analysis (Krippendorff, 1980; Weber, 1987) was performed on the 26 definitions of irritability (citations asterisked in reference list1). Definitions had been frequently brief. The median was 27 words, ranging from 10 to 83 words jmir.6472 (M = 32.69; SD = 18.94). Nvivo 9 (QSR International, 2010) was utilized to assist code the information into compact meaningful units that ranged from 1 word (e.g., anger) to brief phrases (e.g., a low threshold). Preliminary codes were developed after which expanded and contracted to match all the data in a parsimonious manner. This resulted in eight main content categories. Study 1: Findings Behaviour--Most of the definitions (20/26) described irritability as a (verbal or nonverbal) behaviour. Ordinarily (14/20), the behaviour was classified as expressed anger or aggressive behaviour. 3 of Caprara and colleagues' four definitions (Caprara et al., 1986; Caprara, Renzi, D'Imperio, Travaglia, 1983; Caprara, Barbaranelli, Colombo, Politi, Valerio, 1995) produced no reference to an aggressive behaviour, but did reference "offensive," "impulsive," "rude," and/or "controversial" behaviour. The remaining 3 behaviours have been "negative," but not otherwise specified. None from the definitions described violent behaviour. Emotion or affect--All but two (24/26) used emotion words, specifically referred to irritability as an emotion, and/or mentioned irritability was a response to unfavorable feelings. By far, essentially the most widespread emotion mentioned was anger (17/26). Annoyance was described in five definitions and impatience in three definitions.

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Currently_reviewed_after_PsycINFO_search_(n_%3D_126)_were_investigated._The_PubMed_search&oldid=294188