Devices And Assembly Throughout Oregon - - Rigosertib Has Left Without Any Adios

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 10:06, 22 червня 2017, створена Animal13neck (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: Predictor variables achieving bivariate significance were placed into a linear regression model. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to measure th...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Predictor variables achieving bivariate significance were placed into a linear regression model. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to measure the association between social capital subscale scores and HbA1c after controlling potential confounders. The normal distribution SERCA of dependent variable and residuals was tested using visual inspection of data plots, and the Kolmogorov�CSmirnov test. Collinearity diagnostics were performed by means of the variance inflation factors (VIF) for each independent variable entered in the regression equations; a VIF?>?10 was considered as positive multicollinearity (Kleinbaum et?al. 2007). The level of significance was set at P?Wortmannin and uncontrolled diabetes). The response rate was 100% in both groups. The mean age of participants was 51.3 (SD: 7.8) years in the controlled group and 50.1(SD: 7.2) in the uncontrolled group. The difference in mean age between the two groups was not statistically significant (P?=?0.372). The duration of disease was 24.2?months in the controlled group and 23.6?months in the uncontrolled one. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups related to duration of disease or gender (P?>?0.5). The demographic data of patients in the two groups are summarised in Table 1. The controlled group had a higher level of education and occupation, in comparison with the uncontrolled group, and this difference was statistically significant (P?Rigosertib molecular weight between biochemical parameters of these two groups was not statistically significant (Table 2). The mean of social capital score in the controlled group was 185.1 (CI 95% 181.4�C188.6) compared with 175.4 (CI 95% 171.8�C178.8) in the uncontrolled diabetes group. Higher scores were detected in empowerment and political action, trust and solidarity, and the total social capital score in the controlled group (Table 3). The Pearson correlation showed a statistically significant negative correlation in all social capital subscales except ��collective action and co-operation�� and ��social cohesion and inclusion��.