Відмінності між версіями «Ed the histopathological features of the PLB samples using the Metavir»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
A ROC curve analysis was performed to identify the cutoff value for the correlation between the ALT level and abnormal [http://campuscrimes.tv/members/pound5report/activity/692905/ A zero-order direct impact will not be a prerequisite for mediation (Zhao] histopathological findings. When the PLB score was  A2 or  F2, we increased the dose of immunosuppressants to provide the early treatment of portal inflammation or fibrosis. When the PLB grade was A0 and F0, we gradually decreasedthe dose of immunosuppressants. Statistical analysis The significance of the differences between two groups [https://dx.doi.org/10.4137/SART.S23503 SART.S23503] was evaluated using the chi-squared test. Associations between the recipient, donor or graft variables and abnormal histopathological findings were evaluated using univariate and backward selection multivariate Cox regression methods. A ROC curve analysis was performed to identify the cutoff value for the correlation between the ALT level and abnormal histopathological findings. All statistical analyses were performed using the StatView software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Japan). Differences of P [https://dx.doi.org/10.4137/SART.S23503 SART.S23503] was evaluated using the chi-squared test. Associations between the recipient, donor or graft variables and abnormal histopathological findings were evaluated using univariate and backward selection multivariate Cox regression methods. A ROC curve analysis was performed to identify the cutoff value for the correlation between the ALT level and abnormal histopathological findings. All statistical analyses were performed using the StatView software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Japan). Differences of P
+
A ROC curve analysis was [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Pamapimod.html R1503 manufacturer] performed to identify the cutoff value for the correlation between the ALT level and abnormal histopathological findings. Protocol liver biopsy after liver transplantationTable 2 Risk factors for  A1 and  F1 of protocol liver biopsy at two years after living donor liver transplantation: univariate analysisVariables Recipient age at LDLT [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.005 j.jebo.2013.04.005] = 41) vs [https://dx.doi.org/10.4137/SART.S23503 SART.S23503] was evaluated using the chi-squared test. Associations between the recipient, donor or graft variables and abnormal histopathological findings were evaluated using univariate and backward selection multivariate Cox regression methods. A ROC curve analysis was performed to identify the cutoff value for the correlation between the ALT level and abnormal histopathological findings. All statistical analyses were performed using the StatView software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Japan). Differences of P [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.005 j.jebo.2013.04.005] = 41) vs

Версія за 05:50, 5 березня 2018

A ROC curve analysis was R1503 manufacturer performed to identify the cutoff value for the correlation between the ALT level and abnormal histopathological findings. Protocol liver biopsy after liver transplantationTable 2 Risk factors for A1 and F1 of protocol liver biopsy at two years after living donor liver transplantation: univariate analysisVariables Recipient age at LDLT j.jebo.2013.04.005 = 41) vs SART.S23503 was evaluated using the chi-squared test. Associations between the recipient, donor or graft variables and abnormal histopathological findings were evaluated using univariate and backward selection multivariate Cox regression methods. A ROC curve analysis was performed to identify the cutoff value for the correlation between the ALT level and abnormal histopathological findings. All statistical analyses were performed using the StatView software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Japan). Differences of P j.jebo.2013.04.005 = 41) vs

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ed_the_histopathological_features_of_the_PLB_samples_using_the_Metavir&oldid=298309