Відмінності між версіями «Generalization (as with experiments) nor theoretical generalization (as with multisite case»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
Russell, R.E. Ashcroft, and W. ParsonseHealth system is very best conceptualized not as a blueprint and implementation strategy for a state-of-the-art technical program but as a series of overlapping, conflicting, and mutually misunderstood language games that combine to produce a scenario of ambiguity, paradox, incompleteness, and confusion. But going beyond technical "solutions" and engaging with these language games would clash with the bounded rationality that policymakers ordinarily employ to produce their eHealth programs manageable. This may clarify their limited and contained response towards the nuanced messages of in-depth case study reports. Conclusion: The complexity of modern wellness care, combined together with the multiple stakeholders in large technologies initiatives, implies that national eHealth applications require significantly a lot more pondering via than has at times occurred. We will need fewer grand plans and much more finding out communities. The onus, as a result, is on academics to develop methods of drawing judiciously on the richness of case studies to inform and influence eHealth policy, which necessarily occurs within a simplified decision atmosphere. Keywords: eHealth, policymaking, case study, ethnography, evaluation, Wittgenstein, sensemaking, mastering community.eHealth Policy: The Canon of HistoryThose who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. --George [https://www.medchemexpress.com/Lorcaserin-Hydrochloride.html APD356 manufacturer] Santayana (1863?952)National eHealth programs rarely unfold as predicted, especially when very carefully planned out in [https://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9271.1 title= f1000research.9271.1] advance. Obviously, that is definitely since they're complex and [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0650-2 title= s12916-016-0650-2] unpredictable. But policymakers typically persist in considering that issues will go far better subsequent time. Their hubris has reached a level that deserves to be researched in its own right. To that finish, this article argues that lessons are hardly ever learned from national eHealth programs for the reason that insufficient value is placed on in-depth case research, and it makes this case on philosophical as opposed to methodological grounds. We propose that national eHealth programs and, by extension, other complex technology projects with a number of stakeholders and interdependencies could usefully be reconceptualized as Wittgensteinian language games.Why National eHealth Programs Have to have Dead PhilosophersThe United States' 2009 Well being Facts Technologies for Financial and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act allocated up to 27 billion for the adoption and "meaningful use" of electronic well being records by physicians and hospitals involving 2011 and 2015 (Blumenthal and Tavenner 2010). Australia's federal price range for 2010/2011 included A 466.7 million (US 473 million) for the design, building, and [https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00458-16 title= JVI.00458-16] national rollout of a personally controlled electronic wellness record (PCEHR) (Westbrook and Braithwaite 2010). By 2010, Canada's Overall health Infoway implementation plan had been allocated C two.13 billion (US 2.16 billion) (Whitt 2010). In some ways, Engl.Generalization (as with experiments) nor theoretical generalization (as with multisite case comparisons or realist evaluations). But they do deliver the facility for heuristic generalization (i.e., to achieve a clearer understanding of what is going on), thereby enabling additional productive debate about eHealth programs' complex, interdependent social practices. A national Address correspondence to: Trisha Greenhalgh, Yvonne Carter Constructing, 58 Turner Street, London E1 2AB (e-mail: p.greenhalgh@qmul.ac.uk).The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 89, No. four, 2011 (pp. 533?63) c 2011 Milbank Memorial Fund. Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.T.
+
[http://www.talents-arena.com/members/bearfreon14/activity/454969/ Ing out what was going on in Newtown also helps reveal] ParsonseHealth program is finest conceptualized not as a blueprint and implementation strategy to get a state-of-the-art technical method but as a series of overlapping, conflicting, and mutually misunderstood language games that combine to generate a circumstance of ambiguity, paradox, incompleteness, and confusion. --George Santayana (1863?952)National eHealth programs hardly ever unfold as predicted, specifically when very carefully planned out in [https://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9271.1 title= f1000research.9271.1] advance. Certainly, that is certainly due to the fact they may be complex and [https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0650-2 title= s12916-016-0650-2] unpredictable. But policymakers typically persist in pondering that items will go much better subsequent time. Their hubris has reached a level that deserves to be researched in its own suitable. To that end, this short article argues that [http://kupon123.com/members/copperbasket4/activity/199528/ Ing out what was going on in Newtown also aids reveal] lessons are seldom discovered from national eHealth programs due to the fact insufficient worth is placed on in-depth case research, and it tends to make this case on philosophical in lieu of methodological grounds. We propose that national eHealth programs and, by extension, other complicated technology projects with multiple stakeholders and interdependencies could usefully be reconceptualized as Wittgensteinian language games.Why National eHealth Programs Require Dead PhilosophersThe United States' 2009 Wellness Information and facts Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act allocated as much as 27 billion for the adoption and "meaningful use" of electronic wellness records by physicians and hospitals between 2011 and 2015 (Blumenthal and Tavenner 2010). Australia's federal budget for 2010/2011 incorporated A 466.7 million (US 473 million) for the design, developing, and [https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00458-16 title= JVI.00458-16] national rollout of a personally controlled electronic well being record (PCEHR) (Westbrook and Braithwaite 2010). By 2010, Canada's Health Infoway implementation system had been allocated C 2.13 billion (US 2.16 billion) (Whitt 2010). In some strategies, Engl.Generalization (as with experiments) nor theoretical generalization (as with multisite case comparisons or realist evaluations). But they do present the facility for heuristic generalization (i.e., to attain a clearer understanding of what is going on), thereby enabling far more productive debate about eHealth programs' complicated, interdependent social practices. A national Address correspondence to: Trisha Greenhalgh, Yvonne Carter Constructing, 58 Turner Street, London E1 2AB (email: p.greenhalgh@qmul.ac.uk).The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 89, No. 4, 2011 (pp. 533?63) c 2011 Milbank Memorial Fund. Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.T. Greenhalgh, J. Russell, R.E. Ashcroft, and W. ParsonseHealth program is best conceptualized not as a blueprint and implementation strategy for any state-of-the-art technical program but as a series of overlapping, conflicting, and mutually misunderstood language games that combine to create a situation of ambiguity, paradox, incompleteness, and confusion. But going beyond technical "solutions" and engaging with these language games would clash with the bounded rationality that policymakers generally employ to make their eHealth programs manageable. This could explain their limited and contained response to the nuanced messages of in-depth case study reports. Conclusion: The complexity of modern overall health care, combined using the several stakeholders in substantial technology initiatives, signifies that national eHealth programs demand considerably far more thinking via than has sometimes occurred. We need to have fewer grand plans and more finding out communities.

Версія за 07:03, 15 січня 2018

Ing out what was going on in Newtown also helps reveal ParsonseHealth program is finest conceptualized not as a blueprint and implementation strategy to get a state-of-the-art technical method but as a series of overlapping, conflicting, and mutually misunderstood language games that combine to generate a circumstance of ambiguity, paradox, incompleteness, and confusion. --George Santayana (1863?952)National eHealth programs hardly ever unfold as predicted, specifically when very carefully planned out in title= f1000research.9271.1 advance. Certainly, that is certainly due to the fact they may be complex and title= s12916-016-0650-2 unpredictable. But policymakers typically persist in pondering that items will go much better subsequent time. Their hubris has reached a level that deserves to be researched in its own suitable. To that end, this short article argues that Ing out what was going on in Newtown also aids reveal lessons are seldom discovered from national eHealth programs due to the fact insufficient worth is placed on in-depth case research, and it tends to make this case on philosophical in lieu of methodological grounds. We propose that national eHealth programs and, by extension, other complicated technology projects with multiple stakeholders and interdependencies could usefully be reconceptualized as Wittgensteinian language games.Why National eHealth Programs Require Dead PhilosophersThe United States' 2009 Wellness Information and facts Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act allocated as much as 27 billion for the adoption and "meaningful use" of electronic wellness records by physicians and hospitals between 2011 and 2015 (Blumenthal and Tavenner 2010). Australia's federal budget for 2010/2011 incorporated A 466.7 million (US 473 million) for the design, developing, and title= JVI.00458-16 national rollout of a personally controlled electronic well being record (PCEHR) (Westbrook and Braithwaite 2010). By 2010, Canada's Health Infoway implementation system had been allocated C 2.13 billion (US 2.16 billion) (Whitt 2010). In some strategies, Engl.Generalization (as with experiments) nor theoretical generalization (as with multisite case comparisons or realist evaluations). But they do present the facility for heuristic generalization (i.e., to attain a clearer understanding of what is going on), thereby enabling far more productive debate about eHealth programs' complicated, interdependent social practices. A national Address correspondence to: Trisha Greenhalgh, Yvonne Carter Constructing, 58 Turner Street, London E1 2AB (email: p.greenhalgh@qmul.ac.uk).The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 89, No. 4, 2011 (pp. 533?63) c 2011 Milbank Memorial Fund. Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.T. Greenhalgh, J. Russell, R.E. Ashcroft, and W. ParsonseHealth program is best conceptualized not as a blueprint and implementation strategy for any state-of-the-art technical program but as a series of overlapping, conflicting, and mutually misunderstood language games that combine to create a situation of ambiguity, paradox, incompleteness, and confusion. But going beyond technical "solutions" and engaging with these language games would clash with the bounded rationality that policymakers generally employ to make their eHealth programs manageable. This could explain their limited and contained response to the nuanced messages of in-depth case study reports. Conclusion: The complexity of modern overall health care, combined using the several stakeholders in substantial technology initiatives, signifies that national eHealth programs demand considerably far more thinking via than has sometimes occurred. We need to have fewer grand plans and more finding out communities.