Gossips Of Which Adenylyl cyclase Draws To A Close, Take A Look At The Follow-Up

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 13:41, 20 червня 2017, створена Yarn43angle (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: 3?years (range, 31�C70?years) and were consecutively treated by a surgical approach. In 21 implants, the diagnosis was acute apical peri-implantitis (nonsuppu...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

3?years (range, 31�C70?years) and were consecutively treated by a surgical approach. In 21 implants, the diagnosis was acute apical peri-implantitis (nonsuppurated in eight cases and suppurated in 13), as based on the symptoms and radiographic sign, and in three cases it was subacute apical peri-implantitis, as based on the presence of a fistula. After a minimum follow-up of 1?year, 22 implants remained functional, with no clinical or radiologic alterations; the survival rate of the treated GS-7340 concentration implants was 91��6%. Conclusion and clinical implications The early diagnosis of inflammatory implant periapical lesions during the osseintegration phase, and their prompt surgical treatment, led to a survival rate of the treated implants of 91��6%, avoiding implant failure. ""B. Pommer, D. Busenlechner, G. Watzek, G. Mailath-Pokorny, R. Haas, R. F��rhauser Academy for Oral Implantology, Vienna, Austria Background It has been an axiom in implant dentistry that longer and wider implants guarantee lower failure rates, although a linear relationship between implant dimensions and success has never been proven. Recently the application of short (Adenylyl cyclase implants (BIBF 1120 in vivo Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden). Surfaces of all different types of implants were measured using a 5.0 megapixel laser-scanner. Total bone-to-implant contact area (tBICA) along with other factors was correlated to biological and technical success rates. Results There was a tendency for lower implant success and a higher frequency of technical complications (screw loosening, abutment or cast fracture, and repair of ceramics) in full-arch bridges showing low total bone-to-implant contact area (tBICA), however, multivariate analysis considering the influence of biomechanical factors did not reveal a defined threshold for minimal overall implant surface. Conclusion and clinical implications Total bone-to-implant contact area (tBICA) should exceed minimal thresholds, however, interactive effects with other influencing variables, such as anterior-posterior spread, cantilever length, and bridge insertion torque (in cases of immediate loading) need to be considered.""Mucosal thickness should be considered in implant treatment planning.