Відмінності між версіями «Hong Kong Company Formation And Bank Account»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
(Створена сторінка: Bermuda features a zero percent corporate tax rate, as well as no personal income tax rate. Due to the lack of corporate taxes, multinational companies have rak...)
 
м (Hong Kong Company Formation And Bank Account)
 
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
Bermuda features a zero percent corporate tax rate, as well as no personal income tax rate. Due to the lack of corporate taxes, multinational companies have raked in huge amounts of money in Bermuda.(2.) Netherlands:The most popular tax haven among the Fortune 500 is the Netherlands, with more than half of the Fortune 500 reporting at least one subsidiary there. Oxfam's list of the worst corporate tax havens placed this Benelux country at No.3.
+
Over a certain level audited financials are required
 +
Reading the list it doesn't sound that compelling to me and unless there are special circumstances I'd say if you're going to form a resident Gibraltar company you're probably better off looking elsewhere (alternatives discussed in other posts). It used to be that Gibraltar being an EU member but not a member of the VAT regime was helpful but updates to the VAT regime have mostly eliminated these benefits.Favorable Tax TreatmentHowever, Gibraltar is one of only 3, really only 2, jurisdictions within the EEA (European Economic Area) with a particular nuance in their corporate residency laws. Tax residency in Gibraltar is based ONLY on management and control, which means you can have a non-resident Gibraltar company. What does that mean?A non-resident company isn't liable for any local income taxes except on domestic source income (no income in Gibraltar = 0% corporate tax rate). So we've just gone from Gibraltar being a 10% tax jurisdiction, which is OK, but not exceptional, to a fantastic 0% tax regime.
  
National governments often use tax incentives to lure businesses to invest in their country. However, far too often tax incentives have been found to be ineffective, inefficient and costly, according to Oxfam.(3.) Luxembourg: This tiny EU member state remains a center of relaxed fiscal regulation through which multinationals are helped to avoid paying taxes. It's the leading banking center in the Euro zone, with 143 banks that manage assets of around 800 billion dollars.Pros: In Luxembourg, disclosure of professional secrecy may be punished with imprisonment. Asides from that, many [http://www.mfrdinfo.com/ems1/index.php?title=Offshore_Company_Formation_in_Gibraltar Offshore Trust Business Development In Hong Kong] international corporations choose Luxembourg as location for their headquarters and logistics centers, due to low taxes and excellent European location.Cons: Tax exemptions on intellectual property rights may come up to 80% in Luxembourg, which is why many companies choose to manage their IP rights from here. However, it's important to note that the tax exemption applies only to intellectual property rights instituted after December 31 2007.(4.) Cayman Islands: Assets of 1.4 trillion dollars are managed through the banks in this country right now. Being a British territory, which has 200 banks and more than 95,000 companies registered, the Cayman Islands is the world leader in hosting investment funds and the second country in the world where captive insurance companies are registered (designed to ensure the assets of a parent company having another object of activity). Over half of GDP is provided by the Cayman Islands financial services sector.Pros: The Cayman Islands is one of the few countries or territories in which the law allows companies to be formed and manage assets without paying tax. This is considered legal and it's not seen as a strategy to avoid taxes.Cons: The tax benefits for incorporating in the Cayman Islands exists mainly for companies who are doing business in several countries, in order to avoid the hassle of dealing with various taxation systems.(5.) Singapore:Strategically located, the Republic of Singapore has a reputation as a financial center that's really attractive to "offshore" funds of Asian companies and entrepreneurs.Pros: Legislation on the confidentiality of banking information entered into force in 2001 and since then, the electrifying city-state is recognized by the strictness with which it implements that law. And Singapore does not waive these rules, in spite of pressure from foreign governments.Cons: Singapore is not a country used by wealthy individuals seeking important tax benefits, as most countries from this region offer a relaxed tax regime.(6.) Channel Islands:Located between England and France, the Channel Islands host hundreds of international corporate subsidiaries.The Channel Islands consist of two British Crown dependencies:
+
Non-resident Gibraltar companies also benefit from not having the same requirements when it comes to the likes of audited financial statements that resident companies have.Non-Residency RequirementsBy default a Gibraltar company is not non-resident so to ensure it is you need to file according with the local financial authority and meet the appropriate criteria. These include:
  
The Bailiwick of Jersey, consisting of Jersey
+
No funds remitted to Gibraltar
  
The Bailiwick of Guernsey, consisting of three separate jurisdictions: Guernsey, Alderney and Sark
+
No business in Gibraltar or from Gibraltar sources (not a big deal since it's a tiny market of around 80 000 people)
 +
 
 +
Management and control (generally speaking directorship of the company) outside of Gibraltar
 +
This does raise some questions such as:
 +
 
 +
If no funds can be remitted to Gibraltar (there's a sort of remittance basis in their tax system) where should the company bank?
 +
 
 +
If management and control isn't in Gibraltar where should it be?
 +
Banking & ReputationCorporate banking in Gibraltar is virtually non-existent anyway, while Gibraltar is fairly well known for some of their banking it is private banking not corporate banking and certainly not for small businesses. The good news is this means other jurisdictions, particularly other European jurisdictions are fairly familiar with Gibraltar companies banking abroad and relative to a lot of other offshore jurisdictions gaining banking for a Gibraltar company can be relatively easy.Unfortunately, even though this is the case the available jurisdictions that accept non-resident companies with strong banking are few and diminishing so it's becoming more and more attractive to be able to bank locally in spite of an asset protection argument against doing so but that's for another post. For example, I'd never recommend a Canadian company or individual form a Gibraltar company unless management and control were exercised somewhere else since Gibraltar doesn't qualify for Canada's favorable tax regimes and it also taxes based on management and control, meaning the non-resident Gibraltar company would end up fully taxable in Canada.
 +
 
 +
In other words whether to incorporate in Gibraltar becomes based on a variety of other facts and circumstances aside from the merits of the jurisdiction itself.Bottom line if you're going to form a company in Gibraltar and not have it be resident there be sure the foreign management and control won't make the company taxable somewhere else, perhaps somewhere more onerous.Asset Protection & ConfidentialityConfidentiality rules in Gibraltar are mediocre at best. While there are definite limitations on information sharing, which might come about as a result of tax information exchange agreements, FATCA, EU Savings Directive, and multi-lateral exchange agreements, Gibraltar does definitely participate in exchange sharing initiatives and is rated as largely compliant by the OECD.

Поточна версія на 16:37, 20 березня 2018

Over a certain level audited financials are required Reading the list it doesn't sound that compelling to me and unless there are special circumstances I'd say if you're going to form a resident Gibraltar company you're probably better off looking elsewhere (alternatives discussed in other posts). It used to be that Gibraltar being an EU member but not a member of the VAT regime was helpful but updates to the VAT regime have mostly eliminated these benefits.Favorable Tax TreatmentHowever, Gibraltar is one of only 3, really only 2, jurisdictions within the EEA (European Economic Area) with a particular nuance in their corporate residency laws. Tax residency in Gibraltar is based ONLY on management and control, which means you can have a non-resident Gibraltar company. What does that mean?A non-resident company isn't liable for any local income taxes except on domestic source income (no income in Gibraltar = 0% corporate tax rate). So we've just gone from Gibraltar being a 10% tax jurisdiction, which is OK, but not exceptional, to a fantastic 0% tax regime.

Non-resident Gibraltar companies also benefit from not having the same requirements when it comes to the likes of audited financial statements that resident companies have.Non-Residency RequirementsBy default a Gibraltar company is not non-resident so to ensure it is you need to file according with the local financial authority and meet the appropriate criteria. These include:

No funds remitted to Gibraltar

No business in Gibraltar or from Gibraltar sources (not a big deal since it's a tiny market of around 80 000 people)

Management and control (generally speaking directorship of the company) outside of Gibraltar This does raise some questions such as:

If no funds can be remitted to Gibraltar (there's a sort of remittance basis in their tax system) where should the company bank?

If management and control isn't in Gibraltar where should it be? Banking & ReputationCorporate banking in Gibraltar is virtually non-existent anyway, while Gibraltar is fairly well known for some of their banking it is private banking not corporate banking and certainly not for small businesses. The good news is this means other jurisdictions, particularly other European jurisdictions are fairly familiar with Gibraltar companies banking abroad and relative to a lot of other offshore jurisdictions gaining banking for a Gibraltar company can be relatively easy.Unfortunately, even though this is the case the available jurisdictions that accept non-resident companies with strong banking are few and diminishing so it's becoming more and more attractive to be able to bank locally in spite of an asset protection argument against doing so but that's for another post. For example, I'd never recommend a Canadian company or individual form a Gibraltar company unless management and control were exercised somewhere else since Gibraltar doesn't qualify for Canada's favorable tax regimes and it also taxes based on management and control, meaning the non-resident Gibraltar company would end up fully taxable in Canada.

In other words whether to incorporate in Gibraltar becomes based on a variety of other facts and circumstances aside from the merits of the jurisdiction itself.Bottom line if you're going to form a company in Gibraltar and not have it be resident there be sure the foreign management and control won't make the company taxable somewhere else, perhaps somewhere more onerous.Asset Protection & ConfidentialityConfidentiality rules in Gibraltar are mediocre at best. While there are definite limitations on information sharing, which might come about as a result of tax information exchange agreements, FATCA, EU Savings Directive, and multi-lateral exchange agreements, Gibraltar does definitely participate in exchange sharing initiatives and is rated as largely compliant by the OECD.