I Did Not Realize That!: Top Five FMO5 Of This Decade

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Accessibility coverage significantly increased in the NW corridor between the two rounds of the IBBA-NH (49.2% vs 62.5%, respectively; ��2, 18.73; P recorded the least significant increases between the two rounds (9.6% vs 20.1%, respectively). Contact coverage increased significantly in the NW corridor between Round 1 and Round 2 (10.5% vs 30.4%, respectively; ��2, 63.30; PPF-06463922 mouse P in different coverage ratios. Resulting coverage measurements highlight an alternate aspect of interaction between the service and the populace. This may be called ��specific http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Bafilomycin-A1.html coverage��. The actual coverage among people with adequate accessibility to the service can be considered to measure provision-specific coverage. Here, total number of LDTDs in each round �C those who had either heard about the Khushi clinic or seen the logo of the Khushi clinic �C was taken as the denominator to estimate specific coverage. Table 5 highlights the provision-specific coverage based on adequate accessibility. Table 5 Evaluation of provision-specific coverage under the Kavach project, FMO5 IBBA-NH (Rounds 1 and 2) Considering provision-specific coverage, acceptability to LDTDs significantly increased between Rounds 1 and 2 (22.6% to 92.8%; ��2, 1193.365; P