Відмінності між версіями «Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes brief (Fig. 17C»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
 
(не показано 2 проміжні версії ще одного учасника)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
17C, E ) ................................................three Penes long, apical spine slightly [http://forum.timdata.top/index.php?qa=136452&qa_1=vital-function-uniting-austropurcellia-although-present Ngth, as an important feature uniting Austropurcellia. Although this can be present] marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?two ?Disk like structures around the equatorial location virtually touching every single other, maximum separation about 0.3 or significantly less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi With a group of 2? extremely little disks beneath each disk like structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion beneath the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................ A. angelae / A. magnusNymphs (only 3 species identified, practically undistinguishable, the characters under need to be confirmed together with the study of extra material) 1 ?2 ?On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space amongst the subbasal along with the submedian tubercles is quick and strongly concave (Fig. 14A); proper mandible with distal corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space amongst the subbasal plus the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); appropriate mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................two Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00334 fpsyg.2015.00334] 142; Ulmer 1942: 105; Traver 1956b: 7; [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.021 j.cub.2015.05.021] Kimmins 1960: 312; Sattler 1967: 104; Berner 1978: 103; Hubbard 1982a: 270;.Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes short (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................3 Penes lengthy, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes brief, apical spine effectively marked, median remnant of styliger plate regular (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.five?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = 2.9, Fig. 17G) and with a little distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A. magnus FW 7.0?.5 mm; penile lobe not so wide at the base (ratio length / basal width = 4.0?.0, Fig. 17D); with no apical indentation as above .............A. angelaeFemale and eggs of Asthenopus species are strongly equivalent. They may be identified by comparison with co-occurring males. Nonetheless the eggs extracted from female adults or mature nymphs could be keyed as follows: 1 Disk like structures on the equatorial location reasonably nicely separated from every single other, separation about 0.six or a lot more of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?two ?Disk like structures around the equatorial region practically touching every other, maximum separation about 0.3 or much less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi With a group of 2? quite little disks beneath each and every disk like structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion below the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................
+
14A); right mandible with distal [http://www.sdlongzhou.net/comment/html/?117013.html . 53.3] and the junior name is permanently invalid (but see Article 23.9.five) except] corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus Around the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space involving the subbasal plus the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); suitable mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................two Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00334 fpsyg.2015.00334] 142; Ulmer 1942: 105; Traver 1956b: 7; [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.021 j.cub.2015.05.021] Kimmins 1960: 312; Sattler 1967: 104; Berner 1978: 103; Hubbard 1982a: 270;.Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes brief (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................three Penes long, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes brief, apical spine nicely marked, median remnant of styliger plate standard (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.five?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = two.9, Fig. 17G) and using a little distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A. magnus FW 7.0?.5 mm; penile lobe not so wide at the base (ratio length / basal width = four.0?.0, Fig. 17D); devoid of apical indentation as above .............A. angelaeFemale and eggs of Asthenopus species are strongly similar. They might be identified by comparison with co-occurring males. Nonetheless the eggs extracted from female adults or mature nymphs may be keyed as follows: 1 Disk like structures on the equatorial region somewhat effectively separated from every other, separation about 0.six or a lot more of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?2 ?Disk like structures around the equatorial region pretty much touching each and every other, maximum separation about 0.three or less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi Using a group of two? incredibly small disks beneath each disk like structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion beneath the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................ A. angelae / A. magnusNymphs (only three species recognized, nearly undistinguishable, the characters below needs to be confirmed with all the study of more material) 1 ?2 ?On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space in between the subbasal plus the submedian tubercles is quick and strongly concave (Fig. 14A); correct mandible with distal corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space involving the subbasal and also the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); proper mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................two Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length

Поточна версія на 10:14, 30 березня 2018

14A); right mandible with distal . 53.3 and the junior name is permanently invalid (but see Article 23.9.five) except] corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus Around the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space involving the subbasal plus the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); suitable mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................two Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length fpsyg.2015.00334 142; Ulmer 1942: 105; Traver 1956b: 7; j.cub.2015.05.021 Kimmins 1960: 312; Sattler 1967: 104; Berner 1978: 103; Hubbard 1982a: 270;.Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes brief (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................three Penes long, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes brief, apical spine nicely marked, median remnant of styliger plate standard (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.five?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = two.9, Fig. 17G) and using a little distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A. magnus FW 7.0?.5 mm; penile lobe not so wide at the base (ratio length / basal width = four.0?.0, Fig. 17D); devoid of apical indentation as above .............A. angelaeFemale and eggs of Asthenopus species are strongly similar. They might be identified by comparison with co-occurring males. Nonetheless the eggs extracted from female adults or mature nymphs may be keyed as follows: 1 Disk like structures on the equatorial region somewhat effectively separated from every other, separation about 0.six or a lot more of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?2 ?Disk like structures around the equatorial region pretty much touching each and every other, maximum separation about 0.three or less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi Using a group of two? incredibly small disks beneath each disk like structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion beneath the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................ A. angelae / A. magnusNymphs (only three species recognized, nearly undistinguishable, the characters below needs to be confirmed with all the study of more material) 1 ?2 ?On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space in between the subbasal plus the submedian tubercles is quick and strongly concave (Fig. 14A); correct mandible with distal corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space involving the subbasal and also the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); proper mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................two Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ig._17A_)_.........................A._curtus_Apical_spine_of_penes_brief_(Fig._17C&oldid=308208