Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes short (Fig. 17C

curtus Apical spine of penes quick (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................3 Penes extended, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes brief, apical spine well marked, median remnant of styliger plate normal (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.five?0.1; Luminespib chemical information penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = 2.9, Fig. 17G) and with a compact distal indentation near apical spine (arrow in Fig. 17G)................................................................................. A. magnus FW 7.0?.5 mm; penile lobe not so wide at the base (ratio length / basal width = 4.0?.0, Fig. 17D); without the need of apical indentation as above .............A. angelaeFemale and eggs of Asthenopus species are strongly equivalent. They may be identified by comparison with co-occurring males. Nonetheless the eggs extracted from female adults or mature nymphs may well be keyed as follows: 1 Disk like structures on the equatorial location relatively properly separated from every single other, separation about 0.6 or more of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18B, C, E)...........................................................................................................Carlos Molineri et al. / ZooKeys 478: 45?28 (2014)?2 ?Disk like structures around the equatorial area nearly touching each and every other, maximum separation about 0.3 or much less of maximum width of a disk (Fig. 18A, D).... ...................................................................................... A. curtus / A. hubbardi Using a group of two? pretty compact disks beneath each disk like structure (Fig. 18C) ............................................................................................A. guarani Only smooth chorion beneath the disk like structures (Fig. 18B, E) ................ ................................................................................ A. angelae / A. magnusNymphs (only three species identified, pretty much undistinguishable, the characters under needs to be confirmed together with the study of more material) 1 ?two ?Around the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space amongst the subbasal as well as the submedian tubercles is short and strongly concave (Fig. 14A); proper mandible with distal RG7800 chemical information corner of mola strongly protruding ................A. curtus On the inner margin of left mandibular tusk, the space in between the subbasal as well as the submedian tubercles is longer and straighter (Figs 14B ); right mandible with distal corner of mola not strongly protruding ......................two Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length: 1.59?.62 (Fig. 14B, F)................................................................................................. A. angelae Ratio total length of mandible/mandibular tusk length fpsyg.2015.00334 142; Ulmer 1942: 105; Traver 1956b: 7; j.cub.2015.05.021 Kimmins 1960: 312; Sattler 1967: 104; Berner 1978: 103; Hubbard 1982a: 270;.Ig. 17A ) .........................A. curtus Apical spine of penes quick (Fig. 17C, E ) ................................................three Penes long, apical spine slightly marked, median remnant of styliger plate projecting laterally (Fig. 17E ) ..................................................A. guarani Penes brief, apical spine effectively marked, median remnant of styliger plate normal (Fig. 17C) .......................................................................... A. hubbardi FW 9.five?0.1; penile lobe strongly widened basally (ratio length / basal width = two.9, Fig. 17G) and having a tiny distal indentation close to apical spine (arrow in Fig.