Відмінності між версіями «Le illness in peripheral blood or bone marrow even when»
м |
м |
||
| Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
| − | + | Actually, quite few research have demonstrated a clear advantage from MRD eradication or consolidation therapy in CLL,31,32 and some in the techniques tested, though powerful, resulted in substantial toxicity.33-35 Thirdly, it could be argued that MRD assessment is merely a surrogate for evalution of other adverse prognostic markers considering the fact that, for instance, patients having a 17p014 Ferrata Storti Foundation. This really is an open-access paper. doi:ten.3324/haematol.2013.099796 The on the internet version of this short article has a Supplementary Appendix. Manuscript received on October 17, 2013. Manuscript accepted on December 31, 2013. Correspondence: jdelgado@clinic.ub.eshaematologica | 2014; 99(five)R. Santacruz et al.deletion possess a greater probability of remaining MRD-positive right after therapy when compared with patients without having this chromosome abnormality.18 For all these causes, existing guidelines for the management of individuals with CLL suggest MRD assessment only within clinical trials with "curative intention".36 With all this [http://brycefoster.com/members/coughguide59/activity/682734/ E evenly distributed inside the {whole|entire] details in thoughts, we retrospectively evaluated the effect of MRD around the outcome of patients with CLL receiving any front-line therapy in the context of a really detailed prognostic evaluation, like recently described recurrent gene mutations.survival and general survival had been calculated working with a landmark evaluation. All calculations were performed employing either SPSS, version 18.0, or R, version 3.0.1. Two-sided P values 0.05 have been viewed as statistically significant. A detailed explanation in the statistical approaches is available inside the On line Supplement.Outcomes Baseline characteristicsThe median age in the complete cohort was 58 years (variety, 27-93 years), as well as the percentage of sufferers older than 70 years was 22 . According to D ner's hierarchical model, 17/221 (8 ) and 40/221 (18 ) patients had 17p deletion and 11q deletion, respectively.Le illness in peripheral blood or bone marrow even when quite sensitive immunophenotypic or molecular procedures are utilized to look for residual disease. These patients are regarded as to have accomplished a minimal residual illness (MRD) damaging status.17-20 Many phase II trials have demonstrated that patients achieving MRD negativity have a signif-icantly longer survival than people that stay MRD optimistic, and that is accurate for individuals treated with traditional chemotherapy,21,22 monoclonal antibodies,23 chemoimmunotherapy,24 or stem cell transplantation.25,26 Additionally, a phase III trial performed by the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG) lately revealed that sufferers obtaining MRD negativity had significantly longer progression-free and all round survivals, irrespectively of your treatment received.18 Regrettably, however, a few of these studies had been flawed by inappropriate statistical evaluation, especially the measurement of time-to-event outcomes from remedy initiation.27 In addition, there are lots of caveats towards the use of MRD analysis in sufferers with CLL.28 Initially, CLL remains incurable and at least 30 of sufferers who attain MRD negativity soon after front-line therapy with fludarabine-cyclophosphamide (FC) or rituximab-FC sooner or later practical experience a illness relapse within five years.18 Secondly, in contrast to the situation in acute promyelocytic leukemia or chronic myeloid leukemia,29,30 there is no formal proof of a therapeutic advantage of re-treatment upon documentation of MRD positivity just after an initial MRD-negative response compared to therapy at the time of clinical relapse. | |
Версія за 11:26, 26 січня 2018
Actually, quite few research have demonstrated a clear advantage from MRD eradication or consolidation therapy in CLL,31,32 and some in the techniques tested, though powerful, resulted in substantial toxicity.33-35 Thirdly, it could be argued that MRD assessment is merely a surrogate for evalution of other adverse prognostic markers considering the fact that, for instance, patients having a 17p014 Ferrata Storti Foundation. This really is an open-access paper. doi:ten.3324/haematol.2013.099796 The on the internet version of this short article has a Supplementary Appendix. Manuscript received on October 17, 2013. Manuscript accepted on December 31, 2013. Correspondence: jdelgado@clinic.ub.eshaematologica | 2014; 99(five)R. Santacruz et al.deletion possess a greater probability of remaining MRD-positive right after therapy when compared with patients without having this chromosome abnormality.18 For all these causes, existing guidelines for the management of individuals with CLL suggest MRD assessment only within clinical trials with "curative intention".36 With all this E evenly distributed inside the {whole|entire details in thoughts, we retrospectively evaluated the effect of MRD around the outcome of patients with CLL receiving any front-line therapy in the context of a really detailed prognostic evaluation, like recently described recurrent gene mutations.survival and general survival had been calculated working with a landmark evaluation. All calculations were performed employing either SPSS, version 18.0, or R, version 3.0.1. Two-sided P values 0.05 have been viewed as statistically significant. A detailed explanation in the statistical approaches is available inside the On line Supplement.Outcomes Baseline characteristicsThe median age in the complete cohort was 58 years (variety, 27-93 years), as well as the percentage of sufferers older than 70 years was 22 . According to D ner's hierarchical model, 17/221 (8 ) and 40/221 (18 ) patients had 17p deletion and 11q deletion, respectively.Le illness in peripheral blood or bone marrow even when quite sensitive immunophenotypic or molecular procedures are utilized to look for residual disease. These patients are regarded as to have accomplished a minimal residual illness (MRD) damaging status.17-20 Many phase II trials have demonstrated that patients achieving MRD negativity have a signif-icantly longer survival than people that stay MRD optimistic, and that is accurate for individuals treated with traditional chemotherapy,21,22 monoclonal antibodies,23 chemoimmunotherapy,24 or stem cell transplantation.25,26 Additionally, a phase III trial performed by the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG) lately revealed that sufferers obtaining MRD negativity had significantly longer progression-free and all round survivals, irrespectively of your treatment received.18 Regrettably, however, a few of these studies had been flawed by inappropriate statistical evaluation, especially the measurement of time-to-event outcomes from remedy initiation.27 In addition, there are lots of caveats towards the use of MRD analysis in sufferers with CLL.28 Initially, CLL remains incurable and at least 30 of sufferers who attain MRD negativity soon after front-line therapy with fludarabine-cyclophosphamide (FC) or rituximab-FC sooner or later practical experience a illness relapse within five years.18 Secondly, in contrast to the situation in acute promyelocytic leukemia or chronic myeloid leukemia,29,30 there is no formal proof of a therapeutic advantage of re-treatment upon documentation of MRD positivity just after an initial MRD-negative response compared to therapy at the time of clinical relapse.
